Trade Niklas Backstrom
In the immortal words of Denis Lemieux, "Trade me right ****ing now!"
James Mirtle discussed the concept of re-signing or letting Backstrom walk previously. At the time, I was definitely pro-signing him. However, as the team gets further and further mired in the chase for the last playoff spot, we look to Houston and see that there is nobody primed to come up and make a big impact, nor is the Wild's young talent performing anywhere near expectations.
Goaltending wins championships. However, with limited offensive talent, few prospects in the wings, and a system that seems to elevate defensive and goaltending stats, can the $7 million for which Backstrom is reportedly asking be better spect elsewhere? I mean, if Henrik Zetterberg is worth $6M/year and Alexander Ovechkin is worth $7M, do we really think that Backstrom is more valuable to the Wild than Josh Harding by that level of magnitude? Why not take the cap hit for Backstrom and use it to sign two or three actual offensive talents?
Of course, we first need to look at potential trading partners. The most obvious are Detroit, Washington or Chicago as a rent-a-player for the playoff run. All three of those teams are in dire need of goaltending help to push them through the Stanley Cup playoffs, and would have the cap space following a trade. However, who would be potentially coming back this way? Draft choices would be low because these teams are going to end up in the bottom 1/3 of the draft order. Detroit's talent is older than what we would want, and they're not likely to part with Franzen or Holmstrom. Chicago has young talent, but they've made their way this year because they have the right pieces in place on the offensive side of things. Maybe pairing Backstrom with Johnsson or Bouchard could get someone like Martin Havlat or Patrick Sharp, but that's unlikely, because then Chicago is without two of their top scorers. But it would be nice to get some mid 20s proven offensive talent on the roster.
Now, a guy like Backstrom would normally be tough to replace, but the Wild haven't had a problem with goaltenders stepping into the #1 spot and performing well. In fact, in limited exposure, Josh Harding actually has better numbers this year than Backstrom
Yes, I understand that it's only 10 games, and for the most part Harding is an unknown commodity, but if you go back and read Mirtle's article on the Wild goaltending, every goalie the Wild have had has been able to jump in and perform well. Harding's time has come.
This is scary for many to think about, but this team needs a shot in the arm, the front office needs to take a stand. There are too many people underperforming their contracts around here, and it's time for some dead weight to be jettisoned along with the only tradable commodity the Wild have.
- Who do you think the Wild can get for Backstrom?
- What would your trade package entail?
- With whom would you like to see them talk?
- Would you even consider this at all?
- How would you like to spend $7MM/year, a goaltender or a few forwards?
Players making more than $6 Million. Who here would you not rather have than Backstrom?
| Dany Heatley | LW | Ottawa | 10 million |
| Sidney Crosby | C | Pittsburgh | 9 million |
| Alexander Ovechkin | LW | Washington | 9 million |
| Miikka Kiprusoff | G | Calgary | 8.5 million |
| Daniel Briere | C | Philadelphia | 8 million |
| Scott Gomez | C | New York Rangers | 8 million |
| Wade Redden | D | New York Rangers | 8 million |
| Jason Spezza | C | Ottawa | 8 million |
| Kimmo Timonen | D | Philadelphia | 8 million |
| Thomas Vanek | LW | Buffalo | 8 million |
| Brad Richards | C | Dallas | 7.8 million |
| Henrik Lundqvist | G | New | 7.75 million |
| Zdeno Chara | D | Boston | 7.5 million |
| Marian Gaborik | RW | Minnesota | 7.5 million |
| Ilya Kovalchuk | LW | Atlanta | 7.5 million |
| Marian Hossa | RW | Detroit | 7.45 million |
| Niklas Lidstrom | D | Detroit | 7.45 million |
| Ryan Smyth | LW | Colorado | 7.25 million |
| Joe Thornton | C | San Jose | 7.2 million |
| Vincent Lecavalier | C | Tampa Bay | 7.166 million |
| Brian Campbell | D | Chicago | 7.14 million |
| Chris Drury | C | New York Rangers | 7.1 million |
| Jarome Iginla | RW | Calgary | 7 million |
| Roberto Luongo | G | Vancouver | 7 million |
| Dion Phaneuf | D | Calgary | 7 million |
| Michal Rozsival | D | New York Rangers | 7 million |
| Lubomir Visnovsky | D | Edmonton | 7 million |
| Nikolai Khabibulin | G | Chicago | 6.75 million |
| Scott Niedermayer | D | Anaheim | 6.75 million |
| Pavel Datsyuk | C | Detroit | 6.7 million |
| Dan Boyle | D | San Jose | 6.666 million |
| Ed Jovanovski | D | Phoenix | 6.5 million |
| Rick Nash | LW | Columbus | 6.5 million |
| Patrick Marleau | LW | San Jose | 6.3 million |
| Chris Pronger | D | Anaheim | 6.25 million |
| Sheldon Souray | D | Edmonton | 6.25 million |
| Bryan McCabe | D | Florida | 6.15 million |
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Trade him cuz we have to - like always
This seems to be a running motif for this team. The Wild just seem to cultivate great goalies. I heard Lou on KFAN saying if any of the top teams in the East had Backstrom they’d be murdering the entire division.
The problem is, what CAN we get for him? If we get rid of Backs, who’s going to step up and take his place? Josh Harding? Trading a goalie for a goalie seems pretty absurd as well.
All I know is he’s going to get traded because the front office of this team doesn’t have the balls to pony up the cash for a first rate player. Therefore, expect the Wild to go after some has been veteran and some young talent to “rebuild” this team.
This team frustrates me to no end. We’ve been “on the cusp” of having an awesome team for so long, yet the ownership won’t pony up any cash for some top free agents. The Gabby and Backs situation is the same thing – its just a different year.
LAME.
by darksaga on Jan 28, 2009 12:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm...
Well… Chicago is not really an option. Could you imagine the uproar in Chi town if they traded for ANOTHER goalie to put into the rotation?
I still resist the premise that Backs wants even 5 million per, I really do.
But… on to the questions:
1. Not enough. The Wings seem to be content with Conklin. With the signing of Zetterberg, they have less room to sign their “fringe” stars like Hudler, Franzen, Holstrom, etc. Holstrom and Franzen would not fit in the system here, as they like to play in front of the net, and well, that isn’t allowed when wearing a Wild jersey.
I would say they could trade him to a lower grade team like Ottawa(no I did not look at the cap numbers) for a package of picks and young players. That seems more likely than to a playoff contender. If they can swing a deal with the Caps, they become instant Cup favorites.
2. Sorry… I put most of this answer above, but I would think they need high picks in the first and second rounds, and / or a young player ready to play.
3. As I said above, Ottawa, Florida, Tampa (!), someone who is going to be able to give up high picks.
4. I would not consider it. I think they need to re-sign him, and they need to do it before the end of the year. I think $4.5 million per over the course of 3 years keeps him here, and is reasonable.
5. $7MM a year next season brings more than it did this season. I say 4.5 to Backs, take the 6 you get back from Super Groin leaving and sign a freakin’ center. Let Skou-dog walk and bring up someone from the Aeros or sign a low level d-man for the third pairing. The Queen MAB experiment is a failure, so let him walk too. Beyond that, most of the forwards are under contract through next season, so adding a strong center, a scoring wing, and some mid grade d-men in front of Backs… I think you have it better than you think.
The only way to avoid failure, is to learn from it.
by BReynolds on Jan 28, 2009 12:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
RE: Hmmmm
4.5 won’t be enough to sign Backs. With some of the better teams like Detroit and San Jose in need of a young hot goalie, 4.5 isn’t going to cut it.
I think we’re already deep at the center position. Go for a scoring winger and then pick up some good defensemen. If we’re going to lose Backs (count on it) and we stick with Harding, he’s going to need some help back there. God knows B. Burns isn’t going to cut it either.
by darksaga on Jan 28, 2009 1:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
San Jose and Detroit?
No way. SJ has Nabby, and Boucher has shown he is more than capable. Detroit is too close to the cap to bring in Backs at the amount that people seem to think he wants. They already have issues with the stars they have… Holmstrom, Franzen… someone’s walking next season, and the goaltending is already good enough. Not great, but good enough.
The only way to avoid failure, is to learn from it.
by BReynolds on Jan 29, 2009 2:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
$4.5 is too low
I think he’s going to be looking for $6-$7/year. This is his career contract. He’s not a young guy by any means, and all it takes is one team to offer him $7MM, and suddenly he’s WAY too expensive to keep around here.
by nathaneide on Jan 28, 2009 2:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wow ...that would be gutsy
I cannot imagine a team in the playoff race trading their All-Star goalie. You make a lot of good points though….and a bold move might pay big dividends. Chicago? No chance without the Wild being willing to take a lesser goalie at a higher salary back, which kind of defeats the purpose. Ditto Washington. Detroit a fit, but their strategy cap-wise seems to be goalies at a discount. So where’s the market? Who trades god assets knowing Backs and Fernandez are oth on the market in the summer?
I like your thinkng though I’ve linked to your post over at my site inGoalMag.com
by inGoalMag.com on Jan 28, 2009 11:45 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
From your list
I would not rather have Drury, Pronger, ’Bulin, Jovo, Briere, Gomez, really any of the D-men…
Drury has been a disappointment this season, Gomez is old, Jovo is old, ’Bulin would be a step back, not forward, Briere is another Gaborik, and Pronger is a hack job that would truly make me walk away as a fan.
As for D-men… IF, and only IF, the Wild system would actually allow a guy like Boyle or Campbell to play the game they play, then maybe. But offensive d-men have a way of killing their careers here (ie Johnsson). They become “Puck moving” d-men, and lose the scoring touch.
Ryan Smyth has shown nothing since signing his big deal. Luongo is good, but not better than Backs, and if we are going to pay a goalie that much, why would it not be Backs?
As for the rest if the guys in the list… Hossa isn’t coming here, ever. Nor would Kovalchuk given the choice… I know that isn’t the point, but most of these guys are either going nowhere, or going nowhere near signing here.
The only way to avoid failure, is to learn from it.
by BReynolds on Jan 29, 2009 1:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
My point
My point was that I would rather spend the kind of money Backstrom is asking on 30 of the 37 guys on that list and roll with Harding.
by nathaneide on Jan 29, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
can't believe it
Pronger still makes over 6 million? WOW.
Chara would be nice but too expensive.
I know many NHL teams have frowned on bringing over international players, but are there any decent prospects overseas in the KHL or other leagues anybody knows of? It seems like we might be taking a narrow view here of what’s available.
Andrei Zyuzin?
Karel Rachunek?
Allan Rourke?
Rob Davison?
by darksaga on Jan 29, 2009 4:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















