Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Which Players Will Join The 3,000-Hit Club?

On "He Who Shall No Longer be Mentioned"

Today, Puck Daddy has a post about the top ten GMs of the past decade. No, "He Who Shall No Longer be Mentioned" is not truly part of the list, but Wysh gives us this comment while discussing his number 10 pick:


"This could have easily been David Poile of the Nashville Predators or Doug Risebrough of the Minnesota Wild, managing small payrolls and keeping their expansion franchises competitive for most of the decade."

 

If by "keeping them competitive" you mean that "He Who Shall No Longer be Mentioned" traded away draft picks like they were toilet paper and left the prospect cupboard completely bare, allowing for absolutely no future improvement.

Or maybe it means alienating the only true star the franchise has ever seen. 

Or perhaps it is the misuse of the few prospects they did have, such as Colton Gilles and James Sheppard. Gilles' free agent clock is now ticking as he played too many games and Sheppard can't go down to the AHL without waivers, making it impossible to give him the minutes and responsibility he needs to progress, and likely costing him his career in Minnesota at some point in the near future.

Or perhaps "keeping them competitive" means managing the team into infinite mediocrity by bringing in mediocre free agents and forcing a great (although sour puss) coach to work a defensive system that could have put a tweaker to sleep.

Or perhaps it was the trade for Crazy Chris Simon for a sixth round pick at the deadline, so Simon could play in what, six games?

Sure, they made the playoffs. Sure, they even won a division title. Know what they didn't do? Get better. Ever. They got lucky run to go to the conference finals, and after that, nothing. "Keeping them competitive" makes me think of how retail stores say their prices are "competitive," which of course, means they are exactly the same as everyone else. Fans don't want "competitive." They want winners.

"He Who Shall No Longer be Mentioned" is not a winner. No team he has ever been the GM of has gotten better in his time there. Ask the Flames. The Wild are hamstrung for the foreseeable future while Chuck Fletcher first has to undo the damage caused by "He Who Shall No Longer be Mentioned" before he can then make the team better.

I likely should not take too much offense to the one obscure line in an otherwise very good post from Wysh, but anytime "He Who Shall No Longer be Mentioned" is given any kind of credit for anything, it makes my stomach turn.

-Buddha

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

So...

How do you feel about Voldemort’s tenure? It wasn’t very clear.

by KiPA on Dec 5, 2009 2:47 PM CST reply actions  

Wow...

All the terrible trades (Simon, etc.) and other bad decisions he made while he was here has put us in a bad situation right now. So glad “He who shall no longer be mentioned” is gone. The cloud of evil from him and Jacques is still hanging over this team and our fans.

by Call of the Wild on Dec 5, 2009 3:49 PM CST reply actions  

Not to mention

His lackadaisical, at best, treatment of impending UFA contracts. After he lost Gaborik he failed to immediately sign Backstrom. Here’s to another 2 million wasted against the cap. Or how he handled PMB. I’ll shop this guy around and then when there aren’t any takers inexplicably sign him to a 5 year deal. What a joke.

I guess I just need to manage my expectations a little better.

by Schank on Dec 5, 2009 4:54 PM CST reply actions  

Ah, Buddah...

The caption to the picture says it best ;-)

The bottom line is that “He Who Shall No Longer be Mentioned” left this team with no ante and half the big blind. Chip(s?), chair and a prayer. However, the last month has left me very excited for the run: Great choice in GM, good choice in coach and unconditional faith in the new system.

Let's Go Wild!

by redheadzeb on Dec 6, 2009 1:11 AM CST reply actions  

Mentioning vs. Named

I think you mean “He Who Shall No Longer be Named,” since you’re clearly mentioning him.

Or is this the last mention? Probably for the best, since many of us are sick of thinking about that clown.

by buddydave on Dec 7, 2009 9:19 AM CST reply actions  

Hee hee

You are correct, but I went with mentioned. Not sure why. It was from a post right after he was fired. I guess it stuck with me. I should probably switch to “Named.”

I wish he would just go away, but he is the past, and there will be comparisons for ever. Ugh. Makes me sick just thinking about it.

http://www.hockeywilderness.com

by BReynolds on Dec 8, 2009 11:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your Minnesota Wild Blog Community

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Walter_small
This may sound like a weird question, but ...
Small
would you make this trade ?
Small
A few questions
Wildlogoxaw_small
Tim Thomas is a racist?
Small
Who should the Wild sell?
Small
Anybody selling Saturday tickets for March?
Small
The Fail for Nail?
Me
Could this be a bad move? Yeah, maybe for this year...but the future? I'm not so sure.
Peter_griffin_small
Are there lockout positives?
P1000029_small
Lunch with Chuck

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Chuck Fletcher

Twitter_profile_small nathaneide

Mike Yeo

297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small BReynolds

Darby Hendrickson, Daryl Sydor, Rick Wilson & Bob Mason

Mscon_bigger_small ms.conduct

Small bciskie

Granlund_small JDesthubert

N1282200019_30083840_3437_small elisebutler

6merh_small JSLandry

Avatar_small danccchan

Western-lg_small WCHBlog