Email to Wild Owner Craig Leipold re: 2009 NHL Trade Deadline
So, apparently Leipold's email address is available. One individual who gave me permission to reprint his email to the Wild owner as well as Leipold's response. Let me know what you take from this exchange.
Mr. Leipold,
As a hockey fan and casual Wild fan, I'd like to express my displeasure with the continued lack of improvement of the team.
I had some hopes that there would be some effort by the Wild management to make a trade by the deadline. I was hoping that they could get someone who has a chance to put the puck in the net. Once again they are stuck with second stringers, defensive specialists and has beens. They have no serious prospects in Houston and none in the juniors.
The continued apparent mis-management by Mr. Risebrough and his staff makes me glad I gave up my share in season tickets a few years ago. I'll likely to continue to go to a game or two a year when a vendor takes me, otherwise I don't even bother to watch them on TV. I'd rather watch high school, college and youth hockey as I feel they are the better entertainment value.
Good luck,
xxxxxx
Leipold's response
Why would you have given up your tickets a couple of years ago. Dont you remember we won our Division last year? You gave up a little early. I appreciate your sentiment, but you lose your credibility when you throw the towel in when we are Division champions. Regarding this year, where would the Wild be if Gaborik were in the lineup? Would Calgary win the Division without Iginla?
Craig
So, a few thoughts:
- If Iginla was hurt, would Darryl Sutter really not try to replace him at the deadline?
- Calgary made major moves at the deadline to make their team better. Last season, what did the Wild do when they were winning their division at the deadline?
- Is it just me, or does even the owner make it look and sound as if this team is completely happy to be mired in mediocrity?
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
Like Leipold, I'm gonna be blunt...
I think Leipold’s response is fine. If fans want to email the big boss and bitch about stuff, it looks like they’re gonna get it right back, and I’m fine with that. I’d rather he be direct and call people on what they say rather than being a diplomatic doormat.
Why the hell is someone who hasn’t had season tickets for two years and won’t even watch the WIld on TV anymore even bothering to write in? You’ve washed your hands of the team. Go enjoy your rodent hockey. We’ve got MORE than enough people bitching who DO pay to see the team and watch every game.
As to your first question, if the Flames were as mediocre and unlikely to make a cup run as the Wild are, and Iginla were coming back within the next couple of weeks anyway, I doubt Sutter would try to replace him at the deadline. Particularly at the cost of prospects and picks.
by ms.conduct on Mar 6, 2009 10:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Of course
The Flames have prospects and their picks aren’t wasted like Voloshenko, Thelen, Pouliot, etc.
by nathaneide on Mar 6, 2009 3:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
To be Fair
Voloshenko’s failure as a prospect has nothing to do with his talant, and everything to do with work effort. Pouliot has a similer problem, but he has a lower cieling and works harder then Voloshenko.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Mar 6, 2009 10:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
While I agree
that there is nothing wrong with his responce to the fan. I still take issue with the team doing nothing, at least not to collect assets to improve the team next year and in future years. we have done an excellent job of reducing the number of draft picks that we have next year, while failing to develop any real talant in the farm system, other then Harding that is. In addition We haven’t done any thing to really improve the team in years. We consistantly fail to attract top FA talant, to resign our own top talant. the later is in part because we fail to aggreassivly persue long term contracts with our top talant before their walk year. thats why we are paying so much for Backs. if we had persued him in the off season, we could have signed him for a lot less.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Mar 6, 2009 10:36 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Huh
So if I email Leipold, he will actually answer? Interesting.
I like the bluntness of his response, as Ms. C says. However, telling me that they are the division champs while they sit in 11th place doesn’t do much for me. While I agree that complaining to the big boss after you just told him that you have already given up on his product does little more than make the emailer sound like a whiner, I also feel like Leipold could have given a better justification. He seems to me to be a fairly smart guy, and could have done better than a simple brush off.
If Iginla goes down, and Sutter finds out he is going to miss the amount of time Gaborik has, I don’t think Sutter waits to replace him at the deadline. Not to mention that there likely is no replacement for Iginla, but I think he goes and gets someone. They also have other guys who could step up in Squid, Todd “The Idiot” Bertuzzi, they had Lombardi… they could likely get by, and yes, win a division without Iginla.
My opinion on where the Wild would be with Gaborik in the lineup is clear, so I won’t harp on that. The response from Leipold certainly gives the impression that he is at least content with what DR is doing, and that frustrates the hell out me, but it is still a business, and he does still need to defend the actions of the team publicly.
So… I guess I am torn at this point. I feel Leipold could have put together a better response, and still have been just as blunt. I feel he is wrong in defending the actions (or inactions) of DR, but understand why he has to do so. Is he happy with mediocrity? That is yet to be seen. If he allows DR to continue with the current track, then I think he is completely happy with it. If he makes some changes in the front office, then maybe I buy he isn’t happy.
Ugh. I didn;t know what to make of Leipold when he bought the team, and this didn’t help much.
The only way to avoid failure, is to learn from it.
by BReynolds on Mar 6, 2009 12:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well
The Preds weren’t exactly a model franchise under his ownership.
by nathaneide on Mar 6, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm Curious as to whether that was actually Craig Leipold
Or some Dopey intern responding to that.
by Tony_O on Mar 6, 2009 3:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
HA-HA-HA
WHEN ASKED QUESTIONS.. THIS OWNER AND GENERAL MANAGER DO MORE TAP DANCING THAN FRED ASTAIRE AND GENE KELLY COMBINED!!!.. WE ARE PRACTICALLY LAST IN THE NHL IN GOALS SCORED…. THAT EQUALS BORING HOCKEY! THEIR APPROACH IN TO PLAY TO GAME TRYING NOT TO LOSE!! WE KNOW HOW THAT WORKS…. NOT VERY WELL…THEY ARE IN DENIAL!!! HEADS ARE IN THE SAND! FINGERS ARE IN THE EARS.. BLA BLA BLA…. I CANT HEAR YOU…
i SICK OF THE WILD AND THEIR CRAP… MAYBE THEY’LL MOVE THE TEAM TO LAS VEGAS..LOL
by old time hockey guy on Mar 7, 2009 12:34 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Enough
My husband and I have been season ticket holders for many years and are seriously thinking or not renewing this year. We are tired of “next year”, evolving players, the GM kissing up to Mary-Anne and feeling like stupid fans that are willing to settle for mediocrity. As long as the games are sold out why would management need to do anything. Their mind set must be if we put “any” team on the ice they will come!!!!
Time to get rid of Gaborik and the GM and seriously try and win a Cup not JUST make the playoffs! Leipold put your money where your mouth is!!!
by Clou on Mar 7, 2009 8:34 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
first to worst
Leipold said he was going to bring the Stanley Cup to MN. Wrong!! Last year when one of our 30 goal scorers left, Mr. Rolston, it was kinda like oh well. Who did we get? No one that our team couldn’t live without. Zidlicky and Bergeron, terrible! Yeah some powerplay goals, but not much of anything else. At least they took the heat off Skoula. When our management did absolutely nothing to strengthen our team when it was totally apparent we needed help, it also made me wonder the direction and goals of this team. Lemaire, it’s time to retire and let a young coach who knows the new NHL take over. Besides your winning percentage is barley .500, your team couldn’t score a 5 on 3 goal to save their lives, your prevent defense keeps you from winning, and you are the coach, why don’t you take responsibility for a change!!!
by mckay10 on Mar 8, 2009 1:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
-.-
We’ve been a team for 8 effing years! You cannot expect them to win the cup yet. Read what you posted, and then tell me your right..
by Magicmittens on Mar 11, 2009 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They've got no hustle, Skip.
… That’s right Strawberry…
As a season ticket holder, long time fan of the Wild, and an overall passionate person about the sport of hockey …
I’d say the basic problem with the Wild is the lack of an ability to play 60 solid minutes of hockey.
The Wild typically play (up to) one good / consistent period of hockey… (2 if we’re lucky) and then sluff the rest of the game with either no skating / forechecking, dump and chase or just general fumbling and falling all over themselves.
I don’t know if they need more endurance training… or more time watching tapes of their own games (do they even do that?) but somebody needs to say, either you guys skate for 60 minutes or you’re gone.
I love watching High School (and even College) hockey… those guys SKATE for 60 minutes… If they don’t there’s somebody on the bench or in the school that has more motivation / focus that would love to take their place.
Look at Clutterbuck — I’ve watched practices and he is one of the first guys on the ice and one of the last (if not the last) to leave. Voros was like that for the few few months and then he lost it. The rest of the team… even Burns, and especially Sheppard could learn a few things for Buttercup.
I’d take a team of guys who go and grind it out night in and night out and lose than a team that squeaks into the playoffs but gives us half their potential night in and night out… and if you think that the Wild are giving us 100… there has to be other skaters somewhere in the world (remember how we got Backstrom) that want to play in the NHL 100 of the time.
by Ray Raspberry on Mar 12, 2009 3:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















