POLL: Are Wild Fans Pleased?
In our ongoing quest to bring you, the Hockey Wilderness readers, the best news and information about your Minnesota Wild, we sometimes have to do things we don't really want to do. While reading Russo's work is not only fun, but informative, some of the filth we have to dredge through to find you some of the "Off the Trail" goodies and other voices surrounding the Wild is downright disgusting.
Usually, we just let it pass, allowing it to fall on the trash heap in the wasteland of the internet. Today however, we have decided to ask you a question, based on an assertion by Brad Ratgen that "most (if not all) Wild fans are pleased." To be fair, this assertion is made as a comparison to last year. For those who do not know who Brad Ratgen is, he is the Wild "beat writer" (his words, not mine) for HockeyBuzz. Yes. That HockeyBuzz. I will not link to that site, for fear that some kind of internet connection to it will allow for the syphilitic idiocy of his readers to somehow taint this site. If you want to read his entire post, go read it, but turn on multiple virus scans, not only for the computer, but for you as well.
The fact that the Wild sit at a Fan Confidence rating of 37 out of 100 according to SBNation Minnesota, and have been sub 50 since before the season started made us question this assertion. For our part we have two questions. The first, you can answer in the comment section, the second is a poll.
Question One: With his assertion that "Most (if not all) Wild fans are pleased," we assume he actually spoke to Wild fans, and took a scientific poll, accounting for statistical variances, asking non-leading questions, and acquiring a large enough sample size to properly account for what the population as a whole is feeling. Here is the question: Were you contacted by HockeyBuzz or Brad Ratgen to participate in this poll?
Question Two:
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The fourth.
Ok seriously, last year’s 2nd period naps were all cutesy, but I’m not mincing words. It’s bullshit. Pure and utter bullshit that they’ll have a great first period, then snooze in the 2nd and let the opposing team play catch-up.
Then you have last night where not only the second, but the third? NO shots in over ten minutes? That is more than bullshit, it’s bull, horse, pig, chicken and every other feces. With Mikko, Lats, Havlat, Cullen, Clutter et al there is ZERO reason to go that long without a shot. Period.
It is my sincere hope that right now Todd is going batshit nuts on the team. This crap needs to stop and needs to stop now before we go from a few shy of full house to something like Columbus or Nashville.
by TylerDurdenUMD on Oct 26, 2010 11:52 AM CDT reply actions
Also, if I see another game where literally to calculate the difference between opponent penalties and Wild penalties I need to use 1 anything greater than maybe 1.25, I’m going to be climbing the clock tower here in Duluth. Full on clown suit baby.
by TylerDurdenUMD on Oct 26, 2010 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions
Of course, i wasn't polled or contacted about my thoughts on the Wild so far this year.
I’m guessing that you weren’t contacted about your thoughts and guesses based on your work as a Wild Blogger, or with a link to a poll on… that other site.
It seems that the comment comes out of only the relative points the team has this year compared to last year at this time. Yes, the team has more points. Yes, the team is a little bit better at limiting odd man chances. Yes, the powerplay has been better. That doesn’t change the fact that the effort the Wild players bring on a nightly basis is poor, uneven, and very frustrating. The team is taking a lot of poor penalties. They just stop fighting for long segments of the game.
I’m not pleased. I don’t even put most of the blame on Richards right now. I don’t know if any coach could get a consistent, complete game effort out of these guys at the moment.
by Krotz the Wall on Oct 26, 2010 11:54 AM CDT reply actions
Consistency
Is that so much to ask? With consistency, the Wild could be a 45 win team and a 7 or 8 seed. But nooooo.
I’m happy with the addition of Cullen, he’s been fantastic offensively and defensively.
I’m happy with Backstrom. He has been solid even when the rest of the team…isn’t.
Can anyone think of anything else? I can’t. Cullen and Backstrom are the two MVPs of the Wild so far. And the only bright spots, sadly (the PP has sucked the past couple games).
I would say Burns has returned to his old form, and is playing some of the best hockey of his career. Not that he is suddenly an All-Star, but he is definitely much improved over last season.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota Owner: Komissaari erämaa
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
Good point
For some reason I completely forgot about Burns. Don’t think he’s having the impact Cullen or Backs is having, but I agree he’s been much better this year
I think the answer to Q1 is no
because I don’t remember punching anyone in the face recently.
by SpaethCo on Oct 26, 2010 12:35 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Best comment thus far.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota Owner: Komissaari erämaa
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
I almost voted ecstatic
but i thought that might be the wrong answer
http://twitter.com/knowsknothing
No right or wrong answer here. Only answers that don’t make you a syphilitic idiot. HA!
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota Owner: Komissaari erämaa
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
It’s OK to type “smart ass” here. We promise not to tell your mom. ;-)
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota Owner: Komissaari erämaa
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
considering you used syphilitic
I think smartass is usable.
Nothing better than World Series baseball in the snow!
No
would be my answer to question 1. If the poll question had been asked last week after the Canucks game, I may have voted yes. Instead I went with the Are you Nuts option. I consider myself the kind of person always to find a bright side in everything. After last nights game, I see no bright sides or optomism with this team. I’m starting to wonder if Richards is the problem.
q1 No...q2 Yes, I am indeed pleased
I am pleased with the Wild so far. Sure we aren’t the tops on the division or conference, but we aren’t expected to be this year. We have a new GM working to fix HWSNBN’s mistakes, filling the team with a decent amount of talent and potential, making smart and economic moves, while allowing us to remain competitive despite Richards’ difficulties behind the bench. So far this year our only blowout has been the last game against Vancouver, other than that our losses have been close ones that need only a 60 minute effort to turn into wins. I am fine with booting Richards for someone who can get a full effort out of the club and some of its players. A lot of guys are bringing the lunchpail every game: Burns, Falk, Koivu, Cullen, Schultz, The Grinders. Lats has started to pick it up (see the sick stick save he made last night?). Zidlicky is getting back into it. PMB might help if he can get healthy.
Plus I am wholly convince thay Mikael Granlund is going to be a STUD.
I think we need to boot Richards and get an offensively minded player if PMB can’t put up points (Bill Guerin is still available, just saying or we can always trade Cam Barker)
Hockey Wilderness Fantasy Team: 12th Legion
A brave opinion supported with reasoned thought. I’ll accept it.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota Owner: Komissaari erämaa
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
Well...
I actually was contacted by HockeyBuzz. There was a question, and it did have a poll. The question appeared to be written in Russian, so I used the handy-dandy interwebs translator, and found a question which was quite appealing. The translation asked “Are you, or are you not, pleased about the wild burritos they have this year?” Not knowing what a wild burrito was, but knowing that I have never found a burrito I didn’t find intiguing, I natually, voted “pleased.”
It was only later, after Erika, my wife/librarian/information seeker/fact finder, mentioned that this correspondance was written with Belarussian colloquialisms, that I realized I had, in fact, been bamboozled.
I appologize for contributing to the statistical outcome.
I will now take off my wristband in shame.
by mbennett on Oct 26, 2010 2:07 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
We should have a “comment of the day” contest, just so I can award it to you every time.
In interwebz speak, this comment is +1000
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota Owner: Komissaari erämaa
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
haha bamboozled
we should all have fact finders that share our bed
Nothing better than World Series baseball in the snow!
My answer
is no. As of right now, the Wild are mediocre. I’m hoping they can turn it around.
"Danny Valencia is a fricking stud! Hide your daughters!"
-Denard Span
Frustrating
Time for Mr. Negativity to chime in. I am tired of getting 30-40 minutes from these guys. I think everyone here is giving Burns a little too much credit, he’s making two or three bone headed plays a game, but hasn’t been horrible either. The two I have been most disapointed with are Havlat, who may have had his ego flattened when chicago won without him.I don’t even notice Marty when he’s on the ice. keep in mind I was defending Havlat last year.
The other player and it pains me to say this, is …Cal Clutterbuck, I think Cal may be drinking a little too much of the Kool-aid and buying too much into his fan favored status.
Cal may do well to remember what got him into this league, and refocus on those things instead of trying to a more finesse player. He’s still one of the hardest working guys out there, but not living up to the standards, he set for himself.
Other than obviously Cullen, One of the biggest bright spots that no one is mentioning is Nystrom, he is putting out the effort that I expect from Cal
So...
I put the 3rd option. I’m only not pleased with the Wild’s performance on ice, however.
I really do trust Fletch, and I think he’s making huge strides in the right direction. This is still not Fletch’s team. Think of what he did with the Wild’s second line. He completely retooled that line with players that weren’t around in the old regime and they’re (arguably) the most talented scoring line on the Wild.
Also, if the Wild keep doing poorly, Fletch can keep building through the draft. What’s better than one Granlund? TWO GRANLUNDS!
Owner of The Haves & Havlats in the Hockey Wilderness League
This is an excellent answer. The question only had to do with on ice performance this year.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota Owner: Komissaari erämaa
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
That's my feeling as well...
I’m not pleased with what I’m seeing on the ice this year, but I’m willing to hold out and let CF do his thing to keep improving this team. We have some significant contracts coming to an end this season (Brunette, Miettinen, Kobasew), and I’m really interested to see what happens with Bruno and Mittens especially, less so with Kobasew. I am betting that this team will get a lot younger next year.
Like others have said, I just want to see some consistency out of this team. Either way it doesn’t really matter to me. If they’re consistently good, great. If they’re consistently bad, then at least I can focus my time on looking at the CHL and Euro leagues for the draft prospects to console myself throughout the season.
Not Bad Enough
I totally agree with this perspective. On ice has been an utter disaster, save for 3 or four periods all season. CF has definitely shown some savvy, but he is going to be hamstrung by bad contracts for at least one more season, if not two. The Wild will only get $11.79M (hopefully my math is right, bless you Capgeek) off the cap after this year. which still leaves a rather thin margin for error. Additionally, the team isn’t bad enough to get players that would 1. make an immediate impact; 2. bring an immediate renewal of faith and sense of hope to the fans (read: Oilers). I get that no one really wants to be that bad, but in the NHL that is clearly the easiest way to build a competitive team, well that and having competent management.
I want to spin the wheel of justice!
If you gave this poll to half the NHL team right now-I’m sure the answer would be NO, not satisfied- So whats the point of this!
Brad Ratgen is a buffoon and I am surprised you would care what he has to say. I don’t know about other Wild Fans but I think the Wild have a ways to go but they might be “turning” the corner.
It’s not that I care what he has to say, so much as it is really entertaining to poke fun at what he says.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota Owner: Komissaari erämaa
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
Does the Wild actually give that buffoon a press pass? That guys is a clown. Yeah I know what you mean about Hockey Buzz, the place is a joke, so Ratgen fits right in.
Yes. Yes they do.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota Owner: Komissaari erämaa
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.

by 















