Why the Wild will finish last...
Disclaimer: Before you jump all over me this is the first part of 2 articles looking at why the Wild will finish last and why they'll finish first.
Last season the Wild finished 13th, and only the Oilers kept them out of last in the Northwest division. So was last year an aberration or was it the start of a downward trend for the Wild?
Let's start by looking at the coaching. There is no doubt that Jacques Lemaire made average talent look great. It was his coaching and his system that kept the Wild in contention every year and masked the many bad decisions made by former GM Doug Risebrough. In his place the Wild brought in rookie coach Todd Richards. Richards who worked with GM Chuck Fletcher in Pittsburgh was the perfect choice to implement the style of play Fletcher desired, however the results were far less than perfect. In his first season at the helm Richards often looked lost. The Wild's dismal road record reflected that. Even in the great comeback game against Chicago, Richards admitted that he "forgot" he had Owen Nolan, who has been successful in the shootout. His handling of Petr Sykora also raises serious questions. While not every coach and player will mesh, and no one knows for certain what all was going on behind the scenes, Richards shares at least some of the blame for that signing not working out. So can Richards improve in year 2? The easy answer is yes because he can't get much worse. But, he will need a big improvement if the Wild are to compete.
Next let's take a look at the Top 6. Russo has his depth chart as follows:
Brunette-Koivu-Bouchard
Latendresse-Cullen-Havlat
Mikko Koivu is a rock. He has been healthy and has improved every season, with 07-8 when his leg was broken by Mattias Ohlund, being the only exception. However to his left and right are some big question marks. Andrew Brunette is 37, but has aged like fine wine, and speed has never been a part of his game anyway. But every year he gets closer to the end of his career and at some point his game will suffer, could this be that year? On the other side is Bouchard. Butch missed all but 1 game last season and while the indication is that he will be back there is no guarantee he will return to form. And, even when healthy Butch was often criticized by Lemaire for not showing up every game. If he is gone who takes his spot? Miettinen? Mittens is great for 20 goals in 15 games, but is useless the rest of the season.
It is hoped that the addition of Cullen to the 2nd line will help the already productive pairing of Latendresse and Havlat get even better. Cullen has been solid and played in 81 games last season but missed 36 games over the previous 2 seasons and is not getting any younger. Havlat had 77 points 2 seasons ago but only 18 goals and 54 points last year. Health has always been an issue with him. Latendresse was one of the highlights of last season scoring 25 goals in 55 games for the Wild. But can he match and exceed that this season? History is not on his side and seems likely his stats will slide this year and pick up again next year when he is in his contract year.
The bottom six might be the area of biggest improvement for the WIld. Clutterbuck, Kobasew, Miettinen, and Sheppard will be joined by newcomers Madden, Nystrom, and Staubitz. Youngster Wellman will also be fighting for a spot. It will be interesting to see what these lines can do without having to carry Boogaard.
The defense is pretty much the same as last year which doesn't bode well for the Wild. The only changes will be having Barker for a full season and the youngster/yet to be signed player that replaces Hnidy. Burns was terrible at times last year. Barker and Zidlicky have to step up on the powerplay without hurting the team defensively. Schultz looked out of place last season and it will be interesting to see if the coaching staff continues to push him into the more offensive role or allows him to play the defensive role he's been successful with. There are still a lot of question marks on defense for a team that gave up a lot of goals last season.
Goaltending, which had always been a strength, took a step back last season. This was not unexpected with the new style. However the combination of the new style with the defense often hanging him out to dry led to a drop from a .923 sv% to .903. Backstrom is too competitive to have another bad season, but if the defense in front of him doesn't improve, there may not be much he can do. Harding, for now, returns as the backup. He had good and bad moments last season, but will be an UFA next summer. The extra motivation could push him to a better season.
Summary- Last season the Wild went in with a lot of questions: How will they adapt to the new style? Can Havlat replace Gaborik? Can PMB be the 2nd line C? Will Backstrom be as good with Lemaire's style? This season there seems to be just as many questions: How will Wild do in year 2 of the new style? Can Havlat bounce back from his bad year? Can PMB be the 1st line RW? Will PMB play at all? Can Backstrom bounce back from his bad season? Can Burns and the rest of the D bounce back? For the Wild to be competitive the answer to all those questions has to be on the positive side, and that just isn't likely. Some players may improve, but others will take a step back. Overall there are just too many questions to believe the Wild will finish anywhere but the bottom of the league. Really only another terrible season by Edmonton will keep them out of the cellar.
The opinions posted here are not those of Hockey Wilderness
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Johnsson?
Not a bad devil’s advocate post, but you forgot about Johnsson, who is by far the biggest blow to the Wild.
IMO, this team will go as far as the defense takes them…and on paper they look pretty bad:
Zidlicky – all offense, no defense
Zanon – all defense, no offense
Schultz – decent but overpaid defensive player
Burns – often injured, complete wildcard
Barker – PP specialist, poor mobility
Stoner – often injured and untested
Johnsson was amazing at getting the puck under control and starting the breakout…after he was traded, the breakout went to crap and the Wild slid from being right on the bubble to almost a lottery team.
It’s going to take big bounceback years from Burns and Barker if this team wants to go anywhere, and we’ll probably need at least one other defenseman to step up out of nowhere (Scandella, Cuma, Prosser, Falk, etc).
Well, last is a bit much no?
I mean, we had a terrible year this year, yet we finished 13th.. and that was with a new coach, new system and a new meaning to the words ‘’injury bug’‘… We’ve clearly got a better team right now (on paper) than we had last year.
I get all you’re saying and it makes a lot of sense, I agree, but last? No way.
JS, Champion of the first ever Hockey Wilderness Playoff Bracket Challenge! WHOOOOOOOO!
twitter: BubbleWild48
I agree JS.
There’s always predictions before the season starts, but anything can happen.
I am thinking the Wild will be a much better team than last year. A finish between 9th-11th would be more realistic.
Every team comes into the season with questions.
While you’re right on with a lot of the concerns the Wild have, every team has concerns. I can guarantee you that last year Phoenix wasn’t thinking they’d finish 4th in the Western Conference. They were probably praying to the hockey gods for a regular season miracle.
What’s funny is that the Coyotes finished 13th in the 2008-2009 season (which really means nothing for the Wild, just a fun stat).
In short, “questions” don’t condemn a team. It’s too early for that anyway.
Actually, didn't the Coyotes finish 4th in the NHL?.. I'm not sure, but who cares? :P
JS, Champion of the first ever Hockey Wilderness Playoff Bracket Challenge! WHOOOOOOOO!
twitter: BubbleWild48
4th seed because Vancouver won their division.
by red army line on Aug 29, 2010 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions
There are a lot of questions going in this year.
I think that a large part of those fundamental questions will be answered in the positive, at least marginally positive, without much of a doubt. I base this one the nearly universal statistical support that year #2 of a transition always brings a better level of understanding and general performance. This will be most noticed in two areas.
1. Coaching:
Richards had a lot of things to deal with last year. A system that was about as completely different for the players as possible. 2 player fore check pressure, activating both the center and the defense. Lemaire’s system was like a blanket… not only did it clog up the ice defensively, it provided cover for the individual skills and talents of the players. Everything was back, it was numbers on defense and no space allowed… and offense happened in moments and through the few ‘skilled’ players. The pressure and attack system needs active skaters and players throughout, it needs skill, grit, and determination throughout.
Richards found himself in training camp with, according to Russo’s interviews with Fletcher, a bunch of guys who didn’t even show up to camp in shape. He had three lines, and the line that got to play when Boogy got ice time. There was almost no competition for places, at any place through the lineup. There wasn’t any young guys or upcoming talent that was going to make an impact. There was no center depth and no scoring depth.
And, this was Richard’s first time being head coach in the NHL, and only the second or third season ever leading the bench at any level? There is just a lot to learn, about your players, about yourself, about who to work through on the team. It didn’t go well a lot of the time, but I think that I saw enough flashes of the system, of the coaching decisions, to see that if Richard’s can get the lineups right, meaning rightly skilled and motivated players, this team will look better… especially on Special Teams (notoriously slow to come together after a transition) and on defense. Typically, coaches do a better job in their second seasons, most every professional in any field does. (First year professors are notorious for being overly demanding and not communicating as well with students… a lot of personal experience there…, but they get a lot better after a little experience)
The new Coach, Wilson, will help provide a much better balance to the defense. Based on what we know of his past defenses, he will still allow his D to be active in the game. However, the difference will be that it won’t be all of the D-men, and that he’ll have a stronger stress on defensive responsibility than it seemed the team had last year.
2. The Defense:
It can’t be lost on all of us just how much the new system was different and difficult for the Wild D-men to adjust to last year. A great deal of those early losses can be pinned on just how much the D struggled, especially on bad turnovers that resulted in breakaways and being caught up in the play with no cover. The D did get better over the course of the year… until KJ left and the Wild’s breakout suffered greatly.
There are a couple reasons to hope for better things this year. Firstly, the fact that the D unit, collectively, was playing better toward the end of the year. This suggests that part of the issue really was a matter of adjustment. Individually, when Burns came back form his prolonged injury, he looked a whole lot better… he was no longer trying to do all the offensive work himself. Baker got dumped into a new system and role, and he looked tentative. He’s young and has size and skill. He was an impact player when he was in a higher pairing and played PP with the Hawks. Let’s see what an off season, a full camp, and some motivation will do for his game.
Another positive is that there are several prospects pushing for playing time. This not only provides the Wild with options, but it applies a little more pressure and motivation for all the players. Options, plus a new coaching voice, will help the Wild solidify their defensive pairings this year.
Finally, it has to be mentioned that the Wild’s new depth at center, plus the ability to roll 4 real lines, will help most on the defensive side of the game. The fact that the Wild’s 3rd and 4th line got deeper, better, and more skilled will have a direct result in the defensive support (as well as the ability to pressure the opposing team).
What does this all mean?
I think the Wild will be a noticeably more solid team defensively next year. I expect the team to be better able to maintain pressure throughout the game, rather than just in spurts. I expect the special teams to player better. I expect the Wild to struggle to score at times.
This means, in my mind, that the Wild will not find themselves in as many deep holes early in games this coming year. How many times were they badly outplayed in the first period, mostly even in the second, and greatly dominating in the third? I think the Wild will be in more games and by that reason alone they will win more games. They are still lacking in the upper end scoring talent, and that is still going to be a problem. There are still some bigger health risks, mostly with the upper level scoring talent the Wild do have (PMB & Havlat).
There you have it… the Wild will be a more consistent and solid team next year, one that still needs a top level scorer or two before it can reasonably be expected to be a contender for anything. However, it will be team, barring major injuries, that will push for a playoff spot, and be a difficult match up for most teams.
all good points. If we’re able to score about the same (which wasn’t a whole lot) while allowing less goals, the Wild will definitely steal some points.
The players were also starting to settle in the second half of the season. I expect better than last year.
Better... yes.
I actually have hopes that the Wild will be a slightly better scoring team this year as well. Those are a little less quantifiable, outside of a plus return of PMB, a more solid second line for the entire season, and better power play results. If scoring improves, even a little, and there is the expected defensive improvement… a 7 or 8 seed should be expected.
by Krotz the Wall on Aug 27, 2010 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions

by 

















