Jared Spurgeon Injured by Cody McLeod: Spin the Wheel
Just a bit ago, Jared Spurgeon was hit from behind by Cody McLeod, going head first into the back boards. Again, McLeod saw nothing but numbers, and made the hit anyway. Spurgeon was injured on the play, with it looking to maybe be one of multiple things. He went in head first, but looked to not be able to put pressure on his left leg.
Here is the hit (video from @Fels0096):
So, what are we betting the league gives for the reason not to suspend on this one? Spurgeon is a Zizzer-Zazzer Zuzz as we can plainly see? Another toe pick? Some other fairy tale from Mother Goose or Walt Disney?
This one is 100% on Brendan Shanahan and his team. Cody McLeod made the hit, but the Department of Player "Safety" failed to send the message. Someday they'll learn. What are the chances that day is today? I have the odds somewhere between zero and none.
Of course, so many decry the "pansification" of the game. If you take out hits like this, you kill the game. After all, it is a contact sport. Well, I have a question, but I'll let the video ask it:
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
here we go again
Disgusting and uncalled for. I’m getting sick and tired of our players getting these hits and having the perpetrators go unpunished. Shanahan is an absolute moron so I expect him to ignore this type of hit yet again.
No Suspension...
Maybe a fine. Its a terrible thing, but if the league follows suit for recent events, there wont even be a fine.
Some people blame Spurgeon for braking
Of course, because everyone knows you’re supposed to skate full speed into the boards in this situation.
How the fuck does ’’it’s his fault for braking’’ make any sense? What the hell?
I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.
Twitter: BubbleWild48
I guess Spurge needs lessons from this guy

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.
Twitter: BubbleWild48
by JSLandry on Dec 26, 2011 6:53 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
It really doesn’t. I want those people to think just how badly this could have ended up if Spurgeon and McLeod were both skating full speed into the boards. Rather than “slowly skating” and a “simple love tap”, we would have had a head on collision. Spurgeon would probably be paralyzed. Why is it that the respectful and honorable players have to keep on getting injured by dirty plays, but the Matt Cookes, Todd Bertuzzis, Steve Otts, and Sean Averys get to keep on playing without worry?
by delacroixwalrus on Dec 28, 2011 6:25 PM CST up reply actions
No suspension
They’ll talk about size, a light touch, letting up, no real shove, etc. I’m getting bored with it all.
Proprietor of Hockey Wilderness - We take Minnesota hockey WAY too seriously.
I'm tired of complaining about the lack of punishment for dirty hits
But I’m even more tired of having dirty hits to complain about at all.
http://twitter.com/knowsknothing
Deserves a suspension, mosdef
Regardless of all the tiny details that can be picked apart with the play, McLeod was playing the dangerous style of hockey they’re trying to remove from the game and needs to sit for a couple games.
A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.
Mile High Hockey : Where B- is different than C+
Baseball and basketball used to have a lot more fights and dirty plays
They’re more restricted, now. Hasn’t hurt those sports much.
Steve Goodman lives.
If I want to watch dirty hits I'd watch an NFL game
Brendan will do nothing here. Department of Safety Jokes will see nothing and move along. Since it’s not generating “buzz” about the East Coast Classic, we’ll be lucky if he even says anything about it.
How many Wild players need to be injured by these horrible targeting plays before the NHL starts enforcing its own policies?
If Shanahan will not suspend, I hope that Colorado has enough integrity to sit Mcleod for a couple of games.
People need to learn that it is not about intent, it is about results. Mcleod hit Spurgeon from behind, driving Spurgeon headfirst into the boards. Not only that, but Spurgeon was injured by the play. Maybe not a head injury (although there could be some damage there, preventing him from properly using his leg. You know, that is where his brain is, the thing that controls his body, and his leg is part of his body), but an injury nonetheless.
Poor enforcement of the rules will soon lead to fan enforcement of the rules. And the NHL certainly does not want that.
by delacroixwalrus on Dec 27, 2011 11:13 AM CST reply actions
I can only think of ONE solution to this happening over and over again
When Shanahan determines that a play is suspension worthy and there are no injuries, keep the current model but make the average 2 game suspension 3 to 5 MINIMUM.
But what i think is the only solution to this, If you injure the player on the play, you sit out EVERY SINGLE DAY the injured player sits out, bottom line, PERIOD. but on top of that, when a team has a player who is suspended indefinitely, they cannot call up another player to fill the spot, their roster position is filled with the dirty player. This will not only impact the players and help deter them from the cheap shots, But aside from a penalty in that current game, they will think twice when calling up a goon/cheap player in the first place, who wants their 23 player roster/20 dressed to be 22/19, these teams will choose not to play Cooke or Avery etc. So if you dish out a cheap shot resulting in concussion or an ACL injury, theres a chance that player will not play the remainder of that season or even into the next.
The suspending a player as long as the other guy is out won’t work. You would see a sudden rise in fourth line players that miss extended time after hits from important players on other teams. It’s too easy to game.
The other idea is perfect. If a player is suspended, you should have to skate a player short. Make it hurt the team, and the actions will stop.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN
Master of unsustainable passive regression.
It is kind of shocking to me that one of the main factors Shanahan uses (according to the videos) to determine if a suspension is need is if the act resulted in an injury to a player. I want to know what Shanahan is going to call Spurgeon on a stretcher. A bad case of diarrhea? Severe dehydration caused by a delayed reaction to partying on New Year’s Eve 2010?
Bouchard was suspended earlier this year for high sticking. The game he returned after breaking his nose, he received a high stick that bloodied his chin. Why wasn’t the other player suspended? Because it was an “accident”? Like Bouchard’s high stick to Matt Calvert?
Never being suspended before should not factor into a player getting suspended.
Use a player’s perceived intent to determine the length of the punishment, not whether or not the player gets punished at all. It is obvious that the NHL’s department of player safety and discipline are not using the same guidelines in all of their punishments.
Leaving the bench to get in a fight is a 10 game suspension? But hitting someone in the face with your stick and making them bleed is only a 2 minute penalty? Intentionally crippling someone results in only 2 games? Why not have the time fit the crime?
Either enforce the rules indiscriminately or get rid of them all together and let the players police themselves. The fans are getting tired of the league fixing the games. This isn’t wrestling. The games are not predetermined. The fans want it to stay that way.
by delacroixwalrus on Dec 27, 2011 6:05 PM CST reply actions
Department of Star Safety
As a fan of the Wild it is getting more and more difficult to believe the NHL isn’t playing favorites. I always fall back to “what if Sidney Crosby was the one getting hit.” Minimum 5 games for McLeod as a repeat melon farmer.
Unbelievable… just plain unbelievable.
I can tell that Yeo is busting at the seams wanting to call out the league. I hope Leo gets out his checkbook and tells Yeo to have at it. A nice rant by the coach, using facts, could end up on the hotstove (you know, a between period broadcast worth watching). Get Maclean and Friedman asking questions and making statements and attention will follow.
by Mike Murray Jr. on Dec 28, 2011 7:58 AM CST reply actions

by 


















