Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Despite Relocation Drama, Coyotes Overcome Adversity

Better to be Thought the Fool: A Final Word on the Cody McLeod Hit

"It is better to remain silent and thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt."

We posed the question after the non-punishment of Cody McLeod if it would be worse for Brendan Shanahan to not give a reason, or if it would be worse if he actually gave a reason, knowing full well it would be softer than Darcy Hordichuk. Yesterday, we got our answer. It is clearly better for league officials to simply zip it and save themselves the disgrace of opening their mouths, because what comes out is not helpful to anyone.

Since Russo got Shanahan on the record, we have his reasoning, however mind boggling it may be. We also have the opinions of a couple of the most objective members of media one could ever meet. All told, we have one of the greatest collections of absurd reasoning and passing of the buck we have ever seen outside of Washington, DC.

Make the jump for the walk through crazy land.

Star-divide

Let Him Know He Was There

When Lennart Petrell walked away from shoving Marek Zidlicky, we read this from Shanahan:

Petrel/Zidlicky: viewed extensively. Although Petrel's hand is on Zidlicky's back, we do not see a shove prior to the toe pick. No S.D.

Indeed, Paterell's hand was just sort of there. As Jim Mattheson in Edmonton wrote:

To Shanahan's eye, he saw a hand in the back of Zidlicky, almost as a warning from Petrell to the defender that he was there.

With the hit from McLeod on Spurgeon, Shanahan himself had this to say, via Russo:

"McLeod actually sort of reaches out with his hand almost in what appears to us to be an effort to gauge the distance and almost to let him know, 'I'm here,'" Shanahan said. "Spurgeon digs in, applies the brakes and gets run into."

Again... his hand is there to let Spurgeon know he is there. Uh... OK. It is always amazing to read some of the reasoning thrown around in these cases. This one is classic. When did forecheckers start warning players they were coming? Does that warning need to include a push from behind into the boards? How about instead a of a warning, the players simply makes a play for the puck, rather than slamming a guy face first into the glass?

Just a thought.

Brendan Shanahan seems to think that players making plays for the puck along the boards are fair game, just so long as you tap them on the shoulder first to give them the 3 milliseconds of a warning that they are about to get slammed into the wall with the only thing between their brain and the glass is their nose.

Applying the Brakes

This logic eludes me completely. Shanahan says that Spurgeon was applying his brakes. Of course he was, he was skating full speed toward a wall. What would you do, Mr. Shanahan? When did the onus shift back to the player being hit? I believe the rule now says the onus is on the hitter. Unless, of course, the rule changed again.

Of course, Shanahan is not alone in blaming the victim. We have two of the most highly objective reporters ever to pick up an pen to back up his reasoning:

Dater_medium

Yes, that's right. One, Spurgeon "locked up his skates too much." Guess Spurgeon forgot to get the ABS option on his skates. The best part though? "Plus he's tiny." So... Spurgeon deserved what he got because he is small. Note to Justin Falk: In your next meeting with the Avs, do whatever you wish to David Van Der Guilik, since he meets the "being six inches shorter than you" qualifications Dater has laid out.

Oh, and Mike Yeo is a whiner. It's OK, coach, according to other fans (note - not reporters... fans like Dater), Russo and I are also whiners. Just trying to take the focus off of his skidding team. Indeed, because the reporters asked a question about the hit, and Yeo didn't immediately respond with "My team sucks right now." Solid journalism there, Dater.

But wait... Dater's partner at the highly creatively named All Things Avs, one Mr. Mike Chambers (no relation to Diane I am guessing), had these comments about the fact that McLeod went unpunished.

First:

Chambers_1_medium

"Had his brakes on." Referring to McLeod. Let's look at a screen shot from the video, shall we? You know, since the moving pictures seem to be too much for Mr. Chambers.

Spurgeon_medium

How many NHL players "put their brakes on" by moving into a duck foot stance? Could it be that maybe McLeod was bracing himself to lay a dirty hit? Nah. Can't be. He was just "putting his brakes on."

But then, magically, the tune changed just minutes later:

Chambers_2_medium

Now both guys are braking. Still only see one guy breaking in that picture, but OK, believe what you want. Spurgeon caught an edge? This is the magical "toe pick" from your first tweet? If a skater toe picks, he will fall in the direction his toe is facing. Look at the picture above. Spurgeon's skates are parallel to the boards. If he toe picked, he would have fallen toward the corner. Not exactly what happened.

Total accident as McLeod first "warned" spurgeon he was coming with the hand across the numbers. McLeod then "put the brakes on" by turning into a duck foot stance. Then, Spurgeon caught an edge, or "toe picked," while McLeod gently guided him into the boards from behind. I can see how this all happened. All you have to do is remove your brain, put on your fantasy land glasses and shut off all higher reasoning.

But hey, the Wild got a 5 minute power play AND a goal out of the deal. All in exchange for losing one of their top defenders for at least one game, likely more. That, my friends, is a trade every team would make, right? What say you, Avs fans? Let's say you can have a five minute power play and a goal in exchange for losing Eric Johnson for an indeterminate number of games.

Deal, right?

Lessons Learned

We have new set of lessons to incorporate into our book for what is clean and what isn't:

1. When about to make a dirty hit, simply let the player know first by placing your hand on his back.

2. Never attempt to stop before running into the end boards. This is no longer considered safe, especially if you received what we shall affectionately call the "love tap" from the man about to crush you head first into a non moving surface.

3. When beginning a "hockey stop," avoid everything you have been taught since you were four or five. Turning your skate in the same direction is the wrong way to stop, should you wish to avoid supplemental discipline. Instead, learn from the kid next you and do a duck foot style "stop," allowing your media backers to claim you were stopping, yet allowing you to get full force into your hit.

Finally, a stern warning should be issued to Jared Spurgeon. Clearly he cost Cody McLeod a highlight reel hit by being short, having an innate fear of crashing into immovable objects at high speed, not heeding the warning hand-on-back that McLeod gave him, and being six inches shorter than McLeod is. How dare, you good sir?

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Awesome article…

by Eric B on Dec 30, 2011 1:40 PM CST reply actions  

The most confusing bit ...

The NHL refs on the ice feel this is a highly dangerous play (5 and a game) but the suits don’t. 5 and a game as I understand it, is a judgement call and not an automatic by-the-book call. If they were calling it 2 minutes for boarding and no suspension, I’d be telling Falk and Staubitz to start running people until it stops – but 5 and a game is a pretty tough pill to swallow.

The easiest way to fix this? Make 5 and a Game an automatic 2 game suspension that has to be appealed to remove. Make the burden of proof be on the hitting team as to why the refs were in error, as opposed to the hittee asking for justice. It won’t fix the no calls, but in many of the recent hits (PMB and Spurgeon), the hit resulted in 5 and a game.

by Andy06r on Dec 30, 2011 2:00 PM CST reply actions  

Furthermore ...

Such a rule change would give shanahan a leg up. Rather than having to decide to review and then suspend, the result would be automatic. This way shanahan can work on enforcing the really nasty hits and not worry about nickel and diming players and getting egg on his face when he eventually gets one wrong.

by Andy06r on Dec 30, 2011 2:03 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Eric Johnson and Kyle Brodziak...

Would hate this idea very, very much.

They would’ve been suspended merely for getting a 5 and a game that proved to be utter bs.

by Justin J on Dec 30, 2011 2:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Eric?

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.

Twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Dec 30, 2011 2:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I would like to think the number of correct 5 and game calls outweigh the number of incorrect ones.

Unfortunately, the best way to fairly enforce minor suspensions is to make them automatic – assume guilt and prove innocence. Proving innocence shouldn’t be hard to do – as in Brodziak’s case. It would be much harder in McLeod’s

by Andy06r on Dec 30, 2011 2:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Mulligan

Let’s go with Matt, don’t know where my mind went

by Justin J on Dec 30, 2011 2:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't you mean Nick?

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.

Twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Dec 30, 2011 3:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I give up

Yes I do, Guess I’ve checked out.

by Justin J on Dec 30, 2011 5:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Though Matt Johnson would be awesome to have back.

Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN

Master of unsustainable passive regression.

by BReynolds on Dec 30, 2011 4:59 PM CST up reply actions  

They would’ve been suspended merely for getting a 5 and a game that proved to be utter bs.

They could appeal for it to be removed, according to Andy06r’s idea, and they would have won those appeals…Hopefully

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.

Twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Dec 30, 2011 2:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I believe

Giving refs the ability to suspend players beyond the single game for which they were assigned is a bad idea.

Brodziak and Johnson could’ve appealed. Bouchard did appeal with an awesome case and was denied.

Automatic anything leads to lazy decisions. Referees in FIFA have too much power because they endorse the automatic one game suspension for any red card, regardless of how bs it is.

I think even with an appeals process, all this would do is bring referees down to the level of the Department of Player Safety.

by Justin J on Dec 30, 2011 2:49 PM CST up reply actions  

It amazes me

That ‘’he was braking’’ is even an excuse. What the holy fuck was he supposed to do? Crash into the boards full speed à la Luis Mendoza with McLeod up his ass? What a bunch of baloney.

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.

Twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Dec 30, 2011 2:01 PM CST reply actions  

What's clear

is that the NHL doesn’t give a flying (expletive) for player safety. Especially when said player is wearing iron-range red. If it had been Lidstrom instead of Spurgeon, we’d be wondering if the 40-game suspension McLeod received was “too much.”

by Oi Oi Boy on Dec 30, 2011 2:10 PM CST reply actions  

Couple of things.

First – Shanahan obviously hates small guys.

Second – I always put the brakes on before crashing into the boards, but maybe I’m doing it wrong. I learned to play hockey in Eveleth so what do I know.

Third – The hand on the back warning is a cop out. It’s still the hitters responsibility to remain in control. If you want to see the right way to take a guy into the boards, watch the Wild. There were several good examples in the NSH game. Our guy following with a hand on the back, but instead of shoving a guy or running him they reached around and played the puck. But then again our guys aren’t dirty players (except Butch of course.)

by FinnPryde on Dec 30, 2011 5:30 PM CST reply actions  

Here's what kills me about these

In BOTH instances, you can watch the play unfold and the hitter continues forward through what everyone else is calling a “fall”.
In the game against the Oilers, Petrell ends up with his face in the glass as well as running through Zidlicky.
In the photo and video above, you can clearly see McLeod at the glass, finishing through Spurgeon.
How are those not suspendable? If either Petrell or McLeod were really in control and the opposing player (Zids and Spurgeon) just “fell”, why are both hitters still finishing through to the boards? It seems like common sense that the two hitters are not in control and are finishing dirty hits, but maybe my logic isn’t as sharp as I thought…

You know you're a Wild fan if Spam Whoopie Gerald-buns comes up in conversation
Regressing all the way back to high school hockey.
Mikael Granlund = Suomi Savior

by JDesthubert on Dec 30, 2011 5:38 PM CST reply actions  

Honestly, Spurgeon and Zidlicky should both be suspended for interfering with McLeod and Petrell.

Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN

Master of unsustainable passive regression.

by BReynolds on Dec 30, 2011 6:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Clearly logic plays no part in either decision.

by FinnPryde on Dec 30, 2011 6:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Warning

I will warn you I am going to check you from behind by slamming you in the back. That is like wearing one of those meteor hats with a stick poking up as an early warning system.

by WildInBoston on Dec 30, 2011 7:40 PM CST reply actions  

Good Write Up Bryan!

First, Shannahan is a waste of human existence.

Second, Who would ever have thought we would want Colin Campbell back in charge? At least we wouldn’t have had our hopes raised for a fair and just system only to have dreams ripped away by someone who posted a video looking like he had just woke up from a rave party.

Just makes me sick that people make excuses for shit like this.

by wild32384 on Dec 30, 2011 8:16 PM CST reply actions  

Lesson learned Shanahan,

There is just no way to argue with unsupported opinion and denial of reality.

by theyarecalledbreezers on Dec 31, 2011 2:22 AM CST reply actions  

Placing your hand on their back (the area a player is supposedly not allowed to contact intentionally) is a huge cop out and an excuse ready for abuse. In a retroactive scenario, what if Sidney Crosby placed his hand on the back of Marc Savard’s jersey prior to Matt Cooke hitting Marc in the head? Since there was a hand on the back of Marc Savard, he should have known that someone was going to hit him from the blindside, right? That makes Matt Cooke’s hit completely legal. An even better retroactive scenario. Todd Bertuzzi, Steve Moore. Todd was holding Steve’s jersey prior to the punch. Since Steve had to of known that Todd was behind him, the punch to Steve’s head was not a blindside hit and is the equivalent of Todd dropping his gloves a second or two too early. The current interpretation of the rules, as evidenced by Shanahan’s rulings on this hit, those would be legal. Not even suspension worthy. Two minute penalty, tops.

In senseville, a place where people are sensible and not complete idiots, that will not fly. Placing a glove on a target’s back is not enough of a warning of “Hey, someone is going to hit you and you cannot see them. You do not know when they are going to hit you or where. But you are going to get hit.”. Really, that is expected in hockey. Someone is going to hit you. Touching someone’s back should not be considered adequate warning that a player is going to check another player.

And do note that I have been saying touching the jersey and touching the back. Just because a player touches another player’s jersey or back, does not mean that the touched player was able to feel it. Last I checked, a jersey does not have nerves. You are going to need to place pressure on the jersey in order for the player to feel the touch through the jersey and the pads underneath. You will need enough pressure to push the player in order for them to feel it.

If Spurgeon felt McLeod’s touch on him, McLeod must have been pushing on Spurgeon’s back instead of simply giving him a “I’m behind you love tap”.

by delacroixwalrus on Dec 31, 2011 12:09 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your Minnesota Wild Blog Community

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Oh_kaption_my_kaption_small
State-O-D. How do our Defense-men look for next year?
Small
Jordan Staal?
Oh_kaption_my_kaption_small
Do the Wild have a shot at Parise or Nash?
Pumpkin_small
A Short 30 Team Analysis of Where Harding Could Go and Play as a #1 Goalie.
Logo-past-rochestermustangs_small
Shanahan and the Suspensions
Hawkwild_small
Former Minnesota Wild 2012 Stanley Cup Finals Dream Team
Small
Hardest thing to do in hockey?
Small
MN Wild's 2012 Draft Pick Watch #8:  AAAaghgahghgh!!!!!
Small
Hear me out...
Small
MN Wild's 2012 Draft Pick Watch #7: Who does #2 work for?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Chuck Fletcher

Twitter_profile_small nathaneide

Mike Yeo

297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small BReynolds

Darby Hendrickson, Daryl Sydor, Rick Wilson & Bob Mason

Mscon_bigger_small ms.conduct

Small bciskie

Granlund_small JDesthubert

N1282200019_30083840_3437_small elisebutler

Moose_stuff_small JSLandry

Avatar_small danccchan

Western-lg_small WCHBlog