Wild About to Act? Coaching Search Narrows, Possible Cam Barker Buyout
Not a good month for the Minnesota Wid's Kobe Bryant. Uh... Cam Barker.
I think most of us are used to the usual lack of activity by teams during the playoffs. We don't think much about it any more, at least real hockey fans don't. Well, the Stanley Cup finals have already started, and we are three weeks away from the Draft. The Wild are getting ready to start their off season work at full pace.
Here is a link to a great summary article by Russo which covers a bunch of topics about the off season in a conversation with Chuck Fletcher. Some of the things mentioned are the new coach search, new coach's input into the off season, player trades, and a possible buyout of Cam Barker. Take a look at Russo's article, and I'll break some of the stuff down.
Editor's note: We will have more on the coaching search starting today.
Make the jump and discuss the potential Barker buy out, and the coaching search.
Chuck Fletcher's first stated comment was that he wanted a new coach in place so that that coach could have time to weigh in with opinions about the current players on the Wild (and probably Aeros) roster, and the draft prospects. It seems like Craig McTavish has already had several conversations with Fletcher. We know that Fletch wants to talk with Yeo once the AHL playoffs are over, which could be as early as this weekend to as late as later next week. Regardless, we are probably looking a at coaching hire sometime in the next two weeks, not before Fletcher at least gets a chance to talk with Yeo, but at least a few days prior to the draft.
The coaching decision will play in to the next comment by Fletcher. He is looking to reshape this team. His statement is that he is willing to trade any player with the exception of Mikko Koivu. Now, there are several players with either a full or limited no trade, but the idea remains the same. (Guys with full or limited NTs: Mikko Koivu, Martin Havlat, Niklas Backstrom, Matt Cullen, & Marek Zidlicky.) With all the GMs in Toronto for the combine right now, the groundwork for trade talks are being laid. Fletcher will want to hear from his new coach before pulling the trigger on any significant trade. Fletcher's quote here is rather telling:
"I'm open-minded to anything. We have to get better, and we're looking aggressively to do that."
This comment leads to the discussion of Brent Burns and Cam Barker. Fletcher is trying to decide whether or not to buy out Cam Barker. The revelation by Russo that players younger than 25 can be bought out for 1/3 of their contract was interesting. A two year cap hit of $375,000 and $541,000 is not that bad for a player that isn't in the plans of the organization. I would not be surprised if Fletcher pulls the trigger on this one. The window for this move, according to Russo, is 48 hours after the playoffs end, or June 15, through June 30.
Fletcher is saying the appropriate things about Brent Burns. He wants the new coach to have a say in any personnel moves. The Wild are looking to get 'top young talent' to the team, and he considers Burns to be one of the 'top young defensemen in the game'. He plans to talk with Burns' agent and see where both sides are sitting on a contract. Fletcher also adds, "...he [Burns] is regarded very highly by a lot of people outside our organization."
Outside a chance that Fletcher hires a coach that is absolutely sold on keeping Burns on the team, and Burns having a reasonable contract expectation, I fully expect Fletcher to trade Burns for the maximum package he can get in return. I wouldn't be surprised if those contract talks with Burns' agent weren't also intended to get a good idea of what Burns would sign for as it will play a big role in trade negotiations with other teams.
There is also the issue of offers for RFAs and possibly any of the Wild's UFAs. Those offers also need to come in June. A lot of this approach is waiting to be finalized with the hiring of a new coach. The next few weeks are going to be very busy for the Wild, and we just might get the first glimpses of a new direction for the team.
So, who would you like to see as the new coach of the Wild? Should the Wild trade Burns for the best offer or sign him long term? Should the Wild buyout Barker? Besides Burns, who do you think is a likely candidate for a trade? Or, do you believe the Wild will sit mostly pat over the summer, either because there just aren't trade partners like last summer, or because the team decides to stick with what they have?
The opinions posted here are not those of Hockey Wilderness
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
1/3 for Barker interesting...
The cap hits aren’t terrible and would free up about 2.5 million each year. Much better than still paying Parrish a million a year. ugh.
If you can get Burns signed up for a decent contract that doesn’t include a no trade clause, I think that is even better than trading him right away. We’d have a ton of leverage at the deadline for teams needing a mobile defensemen. And sure, if we could get a top forward for him now, that’s good too, but if we buy out Barker and trade Burns, we are suddenly down two defensemen. If we can sign Burns without a no-trade clause, I’ll be happy.
Burns will command a no movement clause. No way Salcer settles for a deal without it. Not even possible, given the level Burns is at, and those around him that got NMCs, he will too.
I am terrified of waiting until the deadline, just because… well… Gaborik.
And being down two d-men? Maybe one and a half. ;-)
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
I think it depends entirely upon the specific direction and the head coach.
I expect Burns to be asking for $5 million plus, with term and at least a few years of no trade. He’s entering his prime years, has a young family, and is looking for security and probable largest contract of his career. I fully expect the decision to come down to two things. The coach and what offers the team gets for Burns around the draft.
I really see the next couple years to be an actual time of reshaping this lineup and freeing up money. Now, if the next coach comes in saying that he wants to build around Koivu and Burns, then we will see a strong push to get Burns extended this summer. Burns is still the far and away best asset for a trade. We know Fletcher is open to listening to any offer on any player, and if the new coach is on board to at least be open, I think the Wild try to find the best draft time package and make a move. The draft is the time where you see a player like Burns most typically moved, either for prospects or picks.
It is too dangerous to wait into the season on Burns. The Gaborik deal is far too fresh. The fact that the team got nothing for Gabby walking is still hurting this team. I think something happens either at draft or certainly before the season starts.
by Krotz the Wall on Jun 3, 2011 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions
So many things to comment on and so little space to do so.
Someone in this story on the Strib website mentioned trading Barker to Florida which is a decent idea given his history with Tallon, but they would want a pick or prospect too so it is not worth that, a buyout is a safer option.
On the coaching search, I think it is obvious it will be Mactavish or Yeo. Both have their pros and cons but I do think it will be Mactavish so that Fletch is not tied to another rookie coach, maybe Yeo will be made an assistant? I think the fan base wants Hitchcock and I think he would bring instant success but not long-term as his effect usually wears off and the players quit on him. Plus I think Fletch will see where Hitchcock gets hired and then use that as an angle to trade Burns there.
Which brings us to trading Brent Burns. Obviously an unpopular decision but probably a financial necessity since Burns’ agent will not cut a deal and will ask for an outrageous price. Burns plus assets could be used to land Parise if Hitch lands there as NJ needs good d-men and Hitch loves him. Burns could also be used to acquire Bobby Ryan, history with Fletch, Anaheim needs d-men, Ryan will never standout in there but could in Minny.
Finally, the draft. I see the Wild taking Mika Zibanejad, Sven Bartschi, Matt Puempel or Joel Armia. Bartschi looks to be considered the Jeff Skinner of this draft and may be gone by 10. Zibanejad too may be gone by then leaving a lot of d-men on the board but I do not think the Wild will use their first rounder on that position. Trading down and picking up a second rounder and then drafting Armia or Puempel may be a good option. Then they can use that second rounder, plus a ready prospect, plus Burns to land the scoring talent on the left wing they desperately need.
Florida is an interesting team for a possible trade.
They do have a good young d man already in the system, and they have a high pick this year. Some are calling for another cornerstone dman, and some are calling for a draft of a high ceiling offensive player. I wonder if a Burns and #10 pick couldn’t return Florida’s #3 and one of Florida’s many younger players with upside. Again, it depends a lot on the immediacy of the turnaround and the nature of the potential packages for Burns.
by Krotz the Wall on Jun 3, 2011 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions
Florida
I would really like that idea. I think the Wild should try and do every thing they can to try and move up and grab a “top” prospect.
I'm glad he didn't.
We don’t want a list of ‘untouchables’. I want Fletcher to be open to any offer and conversation. Koivu makes sense. He’s the team captain, and the team verbally and by contract committed to him for a very long time just a year ago. With a full no trade clause added in. There will be no conversations about a Koivu trade. There probably won’t be any, or many, conversations that deal with any of the players with NTs, but the only player currently on the Wild that the Wild are absolutely committed to is Koivu, there is no way out of that.
Now, I would imagine that there is no way that Granlund will be traded unless someone offers up a completely ridiculous package for him.
by Krotz the Wall on Jun 3, 2011 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions
By the way
Great post, Krotz. In case no one noticed, it was moved to the front page.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
Barker buyout...
Would be worth it… people will say it’s a shame losing the player we lost Leddy for, but we lose out more by keeping him unless he magically goes back to his 40-point form….which could be possible with a new coach, we never know really…
JS, Champion of the first ever Hockey Wilderness Playoff Bracket Challenge! WHOOOOOOOO!
Author, watchdog, enforcer and french-canadian connection for Hockey Wilderness.
twitter: BubbleWild48
Please please please buy out Barker!
I’d be ecstatic when he would be replaced. I honestly don’t even think I would care who it is, as long as he’s gone.
I know it will cost the Wild quite a bit of money, but I think they should try and sign Burnsie. He’s a dynamic player when he’s on his game. Sometimes he makes bone headed plays (but hey, who doesn’t?), but his offensive ability is worth it in my opinion.
"Danny Valencia is a fricking stud! Hide your daughters!"
-Denard Span
The best part
About buying out Barker would be giving that spot to someone else. The only reason Barker was playing last year was because it is painful to pay a guy $3+ million to sit in the press box. Scandella, Falk, Prosser, Cuma… all deserve a chance to prove themselves. It’s time.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
This.
Freeing up more cap space is what this team needs to do right now, so that they can have more options when it comes to Free Agents and Trade Targets. I liked the way that Falk and Scandella played when they were called up, and Prosser has been really good in the playoffs for Houston. I wouldn’t be upset if any of those guys took Barker’s spot. Cuma however, just needs to focus on getting healthy and finding a way to stay that way, otherwise he’ll be in a wheelchair by the time he’s 30.
Here's an idea...
Sign Burnsie, buy out Barker and bring up Prosser to fill his spot. Prosser was the captain of the Sioux Falls Stampede team that won the USHL’s Clark Cup Finals in 2006-2007 and now he scores the game winning goal of Game Three of the Calder Cup Finals, coincidence? I think not.
Don't need to necessarily bring up Nate Prosser
In your scenario, there are already 5 d-men on the roster (Burns, Schultz, Zanon, Stoner, Zidlicky). Spurgeon would be the most likely choice to take the 6th spot, as he’s earned the first shot at the job.
Not only that...
AHL and USHL success don’t necessarily equal NHL success. There’s a reason we didn’t see much of him this season. If he gets better, he’ll be a frequent injury call-up at best with the way things are set-up right now with Burns, Schultz, Zanon, Stoner, Zidlicky and Spurgeon (supposing of course Burns is signed and Barker is gone.)
Also, I wouldn’t be surprised that if in fact Barker is bought out, Fletch would probably sign a FA to be an inexpensive 6th-7th d-man.
JS, Champion of the first ever Hockey Wilderness Playoff Bracket Challenge! WHOOOOOOOO!
Author, watchdog, enforcer and french-canadian connection for Hockey Wilderness.
twitter: BubbleWild48
Probably a 7th, although if someone can teach Falk to play with a mean streak, he would make a great 7th and possibly challenge for a 6th.
If Burns is dealt, then Fletch would definitely be in the market for an NHL-ready d-man.
Agreed
If Burns is dealt, an FA is signed for sure, couldn’t imagine Fletch not getting at least a 6th…Of course, that depends what Burns gives us, but I couldn’t imagine anything else than a scorer and a pick.
JS, Champion of the first ever Hockey Wilderness Playoff Bracket Challenge! WHOOOOOOOO!
Author, watchdog, enforcer and french-canadian connection for Hockey Wilderness.
twitter: BubbleWild48
I'd put Scandella ahead of Prosser
I’d also put Falk ahead of Prosser.
JS, Champion of the first ever Hockey Wilderness Playoff Bracket Challenge! WHOOOOOOOO!
Author, watchdog, enforcer and french-canadian connection for Hockey Wilderness.
twitter: BubbleWild48
Prosser is still a ways from the NHL. I think he could do it, but has too much talent in front of him. Scandella, Falk, then maybe Prosser. Spurge has them all beat.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
If I try to trade anyone,
I trade Zidlicky, then Schultz then Barker…. if possible. Zid at 4mil is stupid, Schultz at 3.5 is a bit steep for pure d and no offensive ability. and barker is well barker.
Resign burnsie unless we can trade for Parise and a pick.
zidlicky has a no-movement clause
so he’s not going anywhere. You’re right in that Schultz is overpaid, but that is also the reason why he can’t be traded, no one wants to pay him that much. And I’m warming up to the idea of buying out Barker. Give Scandella or Falk a chance to fill that position, and free up a little more cap space in the process.
No movment clauses
arent set in stone. you can always ask him to waive the clause, plus, at the trade deadline this next season, we will be able to move him with out his permission.

by 





















