Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yankees Deny Rumors That Team Is For Sale

Minnesota Wild Coaching Candidate: Mike Yeo

The list of possible Wild candidates is not long. Six names have been reported, a mix of veteran and "rookie" coaches, most of whom are more Jacques Lemaire than Scotty Bowman. The list includes impressive resumes like Craig MacTavish and Ken Hitchcock, and it includes guys looking for their first big break like Peter Horachek and, as we study today, Mike Yeo.

Wild fans seem split on what they want, save that they want to pay to watch a team that wins. The coaches on the list have certainly done their share of winning, but only one of them is doing any winning right now, and that's Yeo.

Make the jump as we talk with the greatest Houston Aeros writer of all time, Ms. Conduct. You can find her work at her own blog bearing her name, at The Third Intermission, and at Pro Hockey News

Star-divide

HW: How does Yeo get buy-in from players?

MsC: He comes in with tremendous credibility, for starters he played at this level, he won championships at this level, he's coached a team to the Stanley Cup. 

He builds strong relationships with the leaders on the team, but he also knows every guy on the team and gives of himself to them and their development and their well-being. And they reciprocate by doing what he asks. And the cycle completes itself when they see that his systems bring success, so they keep doing what he asks.

He creates a positive environment, not that he can't be a hard ass but that's not his general MO. He puts guys in a position to succeed rather than forcing them into roles that don't fit them. His lines are stable, generally, so that guys can build chemistry and there's little confusion about who has what role.

The team culture celebrates not just scoring but blocked shots, great defensive efforts, and smart play without the puck. He's smart enough to be diplomatic without being condescending or withholding unnecessarily, when talking to the media and talking publicly about his team.

The message is consistent: Play to the process, not to the result.

He is a good and fair man and I think players respect that. If they honestly give their all, they're going to get a fair shake and they know it.

HW: We know he has an "up-tempo" style, but will it work for the Wild?

MsC: It's uptempo but if I had to pick a "hockey term" for it, this team is really more about puck possession. Win the little battles as often as possible. Never ever give up on getting a puck off their stick and onto yours and once you have the puck, protect it with everything you've got. Be in the right place without the puck to give your teammate with the puck an option to get it to you cleanly. 

It's literally like a team full of Andrew Brunettes, except with speed.

HW: What does accountability look like with Mike Yeo? Bag skates? Is he a players coach? 

MsC: The players are accountable to each other. I don't know how you establish a culture like that, but somehow he's done it, and I think being accountable to each other is more important than being accountable to the coach. Because when you have leadership like this team has (DiSalvatore, Ortemeyer, Peters, O'Sullivan, etc.) and you see the level of accountability and professionalism they show, and you commit to living up to that standard, too, you really have no weak links in the chain. But that's all tone at the top. That's all coming from Yeo, ultimately.

And yes, he is a players coach. And I have no idea about bag skates. I'm sure they've had a few through the season because it certainly hasn't been smooth sailing all the way by any means. But because he's not a guy who is full of bluster generally, when he does get mad or have something to say, it's not falling on deaf ears.

MsC: Now that you got me all weepy about how amazing Yeo and this team are, I have to tell you why you should avoid him at all costs? Okay, I'll try:

Things that Absolutely Suck about Mike Yeo

  • He's bald and the glare is distracting.
  • Sometimes he wears glasses, sometimes contacts, which indicates indecisiveness and lack of ability to commit.
  • He's got that godawful Canadian accent. "Aboat" this, "aboat" that. Learn English!
  • He never yells at reporters for dumb questions. How the hell are we supposed to learn?
  • He sent Petr Kalus packing. Geez. Doesn't he know he scored 8 goals in his first pro game? He was a superstar in the making, no question.
  • The real reason he moved back to Texas was his raging Whataburger addiction. Get help, man.
  • He's only 6'1". #midget
  • All those championships he's been a part of? Just showing off, really. Cocky bastard. 
First off, let me thank Ms. C for taking the time out of her schedule to help with this. Not like she is in the middle of jetting around with the team covering the Calder Cup Finals or anything. Oh... wait. Please note, Ms.C would really like if the Wild hired someone else, leaving Coach Yeo in Houston and winning more games for her favorite team. 

Mike Yeo is the only coach on the list that I have had the pleasure of dealing with. Last year at the Wild's development camp, Yeo made himself available to media each day, and was gracious with his time and his answers. He does not seem the type to blow smoke, and while he is certainly slick with his answers, he gets the message through loud and clear. 

As for on ice results, Wild fans should all be aware of just what he has done with the Aeros. Not only does him have them in the Calder Cup finals, but he has developed many great prospects for the NHL team, and continues to do so with this run. Asked last year if he planned to win the Calder Cup, his answer was that the job of the Aeros was to make the Minnesota Wild a better team, and that a long playoff run would certainly help with that.

He delivered that, and has got to be a front runner in this particular contest because of that.

His time with the Penguins doesn't hurt his chances, although if you listen to Penguins fans, he was responsible for the demise of the Pens power play, something Kevin from Hitting the Post disagrees with, and something that does not match up with what we see in Houston. Having his name on the Stanley Cup probably doesn't hurt either.

Chuck Fletcher is in a tough spot with this coaching hire. He took a gamble on an unproven "rookie" coach with Todd Richards, and that did not work out. Many pundits say Fletcher has to go with a veteran coach, someone who can handle NHL personalities, rather than be handled by them. This puts MacTavish and Hitchcock at the top of the list.

There are a growing number of media and fans alike that are leaning toward Yeo, however. Despite Ms. C's reasons not to hire him, Yeo is the logical extension of what had to be the plan Chuck Fletcher was putting in place. His style is similar to Richards', without being a duplication. His style of coaching is similar, but with proven results. He is already in the organization, and he has proven he can make more out of a team than the sum of the parts.

Mike Yeo is busy coaching the Aeros in the alder Cup finals. The Wild have not hired a coach, despite interviewing some of the top candidates out there. The decision is either resting on Yeo being a top candidate, or on Yeo at least being given the respect of an interview. My personal feeling is Yeo is the front runner, but I admit, I have nothing to base that on other than gut feeling.

This is the guy in my book. What say you, Wilderness? 

Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I haven't

paid all that much attention to the coaching search.
Basically what I’ve heard is do we want to win now or build for the future?
If Fletch picks the latter, I think Yeo will be our guy

PROTIP: Getting batters out with a lead is the most effective way to win games

by NorthernStar on Jun 7, 2011 11:27 AM CDT reply actions  

Best Coach Since Tippet

Yeo is the best coach the Aeros have had since Dave Tippet.

Mike Yeo has taken the Aeros higher than their skill level by getting the guys to believe in each other. Yes he had a system in mind but he has adapted his system to the skaters he inherited. Practices are hard and fruitful (Sydor still like to hit). The guys are in better shape than anyone we have played against this year.

He would be able to get the most out of the Wild players and I think there would be less injury lost time.

In short if he does not succeed at the Wild then he wll be beating them with some other NHL team.

by Al W on Jun 7, 2011 11:36 AM CDT reply actions  

I like guys that are adaptable.

The game is constantly changing, coaches need to be willing to as well if it’ll bring success.

by FinnPryde on Jun 7, 2011 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like Yeo.

2 years ago I would have said absolutely without any hesitation. After Richards, I have to stop and think for a minute about whether they should roll the dice on a “rookie” coach again.

That said, Yeo isn’t Richards. I think he’s got more experience as a coach and at a higher level. After reading this I also like the sound of his system and how he handles his team. With the type of players we have I think it could work. I don’t think they’ll be an instant cup contender, but I think that Yeo can work toward that while still giving us exciting hockey along the way.

Most of the other candidates are defense-first style coaches similar to Lemaire, while Richards tried to implement an up-tempo game. I think having the team bounce back and forth between such different systems will breed too much confusion and result in a bad on-ice product. When looking at all the candidates, Yeo would be my top choice.

by FinnPryde on Jun 7, 2011 11:37 AM CDT reply actions  

It’s uptempo but if I had to pick a “hockey term” for it, this team is really more about puck possession. Win the little battles as often as possible. Never ever give up on getting a puck off their stick and onto yours and once you have the puck, protect it with everything you’ve got.

The Wild are a terrible puck possession team. From the blueline to the forecheck, this team doesn’t control the tempo well. I think that would have been evident by the fact that they got outshot 4,876,293 times last season. That really doesn’t sound like the correct system to employ for the team.

The players are accountable to each other. I don’t know how you establish a culture like that, but somehow he’s done it, and I think being accountable to each other is more important than being accountable to the coach.

Well, that clearly didn’t happen for the Wild. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this a team that laid down and died last year when it counted the most? Is everyone expecting Yeo to somehow make this team actually want to fight for each other? I’m just not seeing this type of solidarity on the roster based on how last season transpired.

His style is similar to Richards’, without being a duplication. His style of coaching is similar, but with proven results.

The Richards style of coaching and systems didn’t work for this team. Why would you go back to the well? You know it’s dry.
Also, as for proven results, wasn’t that said of Richards when he came here after being an assistant? His system and coaching style had proven results, but it didn’t matter at all when given a poor roster that lacks true leadership.

I think a lot of the Wilderness will argue that Richards was fired because he just didn’t fit this team. I believe that’s the reasoning Fletcher used when he dismissed Todd. So why would we go back to more of the same? The roster didn’t get more talented, there’s still no true leaders after Koivu, and it seems like the young guys are going to have to start taking their lumps in the NHL. This really seems like the worst fit for for a coach that the Wild could make short of bring Richards back.

by JDesthubert on Jun 7, 2011 12:11 PM CDT reply actions  

The Wild are a terrible puck possession team.

How do you know? That wasn’t Richards’ system. Dump and chase is not puck possession. Watch the Aeros, it is a totally different game, and he didn’t change to fit the players, he made the players change to fit his style. Richards was hard forechecking after the dump. Yeo is less dump and chase, more control the puck the entire time.

Well, that clearly didn’t happen for the Wild. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this a team that laid down and died last year when it counted the most?

They laid down because their coach lost them. Yeo is not Richards.

Also, as for proven results, wasn’t that said of Richards when he came here after being an assistant?

No. Richards was the next hot thing coming through the ranks. Not sure Todd Richards & his team ever won a Stanley Cup. You don’t become an assistant coach on a Stanley Cup team, and then leave and take your new team to the finals in the AHL by being a bad coach.

Is everyone expecting Yeo to somehow make this team actually want to fight for each other? I’m just not seeing this type of solidarity on the roster based on how last season transpired.

Yes. Because they gave up on the coach, not on each other.

The Richards style of coaching and systems didn’t work for this team. Why would you go back to the well?

Yeo is not Richards. I said similar, not the same. If a well runs dry, a spring can be found just feet away.

Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN

Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.

by BReynolds on Jun 7, 2011 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

How are the Wild a bad possession team? Well, they did get outshot in 69 out of 82 regular season games. They ranked about 18th in give away vs. take away numbers, and if they weren’t playing Edmonton or Colorado they lost the time of possession battles as well. You can’t just blame poor possession on dump and chase hockey, because there are teams in the NHL that can make it work. The Wild weren’t one of them. They were dead last in hits, which is pathetic for a dump and chase team. That stat indicates to me that the team didn’t go hard to the puck, didn’t battle, and as such, were a poor puck possession team.

When a team lays an egg 8-1 against an opponent, I’m inclined to say they gave up on a few more people than just the coach. Now, I’m not saying that they didn’t give up on Richards, because they most definitely did. What I am saying is that they gave up on themselves, the man sitting next to them, and the fan base. At some point, pride should kick in, but the players didn’t have that going down the home stretch.

From Nathan:

Richards started his coaching career as an assistant with the Milwaukee Admirals, going to the AHL playoffs each season, adding a Calder Cup win over Wilkes-Barre/Scranton in 2004. He then moved to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton in 2006, taking over the helm. At Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, he led them to the playoffs twice, losing in the second round to the Hershey Bears in 06-07 and losing in the finals to the Chicago Wolves in 07-08 before being called up by the San Jose Sharks to serve as an assistant coach in 08-09, helping them win a Presidents Trophy before losing in the opening round. Seven years of assistant and head coaching experience, seven playoff appearances.

Richards is a guy who promotes an up-tempo offense, solid back-checking and knows the “new” NHL. This is an outstanding choice by Fletcher and a great way to reboot the franchise. I look forward to seeing what Richards can get out of this team and can’t wait to find out what he and Chuck Fletcher have in store for the personnel.
This is his quote about the hiring and previous success of Todd Richards. I’ve included the link so you don’t have to go scrolling around to find the article. Essentially, you guys told the Wilderness that Richards had the pedigree and the proven results (making the playoffs 7 out of 7 years) to be a great head coach.
http://www.hockeywilderness.com/2009/6/16/911036/todd-richards-hired-as-minnesota

Now, I’ve said it many times that I’ve got nothing against Yeo or his style of coaching. I just don’t see him fitting properly. It sounds like the same thing when Richards was hired, and that got the team nowhere.

by JDesthubert on Jun 7, 2011 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

For some reason this part didn't get in the quote box, my bad tee hee
Richards is a guy who promotes an up-tempo offense, solid back-checking and knows the "new" NHL. This is an outstanding choice by Fletcher and a great way to reboot the franchise. I look forward to seeing what Richards can get out of this team and can’t wait to find out what he and Chuck Fletcher have in store for the personnel.

by JDesthubert on Jun 7, 2011 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

OK, so Nathan said he had the pedigree to be a great choice, and it didn’t work. Does that mean Yeo won’t? Seven years of experience and making the playoffs seven times indicates a guy who deserves a chance. He blew it. Again, that doesn’t mean Yeo will. Also, the quote you gave never said he would be a great coach, only that he could be. He still could be, and I have maintained that still to this day. Todd Richards is a good coach, and a good man. Given another chance, Todd Richards, his system, and his style of coaching could still be very successful. Just because he failed here does not mean he will fail somewhere else.

Remember, other than Yeo, and Horachek, the other coahes have all been fired from NHL jobs for being ineffective. What’s gives you so much confidence in them?

Richards was the best choice available. Yeo is the best choice available. That’s where the direct comparisons stop. They are two different people, and neither trained the other. I don’t know how to say it any other way. Two different people, two different styles.

You are hung up on the fact that both have similar (note: not the same) backgrounds. It matters very little.

Finally, I still don’t get how shots on goal has anything to do with a puck possession style. Name a dump and chase team that plays a puck possession style. The two are conflicting. Dump and chase, by definition, is giving up possession. Sure, teams make it work, but they are forechecking teams, not puck possession. Out of 100 possessions, how many times do you see the Wings dump and chase? That’s puck possession.

Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN

Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.

by BReynolds on Jun 7, 2011 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also, as for proven results, wasn’t that said of Richards when he came here after being an assistant?

No. Richards was the next hot thing coming through the ranks. Not sure Todd Richards & his team ever won a Stanley Cup. You don’t become an assistant coach on a Stanley Cup team, and then leave and take your new team to the finals in the AHL by being a bad coach.

I was simply using Nathan’s quote to back up my argument. You said that no one had said Richards had proven results, and I wanted to use evidence to show otherwise. The quote had nothing to do with Yeo. I was simply trying to illustrate my point that Richards was hyped based on history and pedigree, and it meant nothing when it came to coaching the Minnesota Wild. In fact, I even said right after my question that you used:

His system and coaching style had proven results, but it didn’t matter at all when given a poor roster that lacks true leadership.

It’s not an indictment of Richards or Yeo or their coaching style. There’s just not a lot of talent that any coach is going to have to work with.

2nd, I never said I was confident in any coach, so putting words in my mouth doesn’t work here. I’ve said I think Hitch is probably the best option considering the lack of talent and his style. He is, in my opinion, the best stop-gap we have as an option right now. He’ll ask the team to be defensively responsible, and score by committee, which is basically what the Wild have to do now anyways to be competitive. No matter who coaches, this squad isn’t going to out-dazzle or skate circles around their opposition. They’re going to have to be responsible and win tight games to be competitive.

Generally speaking, puck possession will generally lead to shots on goal. Teams that control tempo and possession will, more often than not, out shoot their opponents.
Now, I define giving up possession with the word turnovers. Dump and chase I define as a style of forechecking. It becomes a turnover when teams don’t execute the chase part very well.
As for the Wings, they will dump and chase with their energy lines or guys not names Datsyuk or Zetterberg. Even Holmstrom and Franzen will dump the puck into the corners and then go get it. Playoff hockey is built on chip and chase, not fancy blueline dangles. The difference between playoff teams doing this and the Wild is simply the fact that the Wild don’t work hard in the corners. They didn’t win the little battles that maintain possession.

I’ve said this many times before, and I’ll have to say this again: I do believe that Mike Yeo is a good hockey coach, and deserves to be commended; however, bringing him into the current mess that is the Minnesota Wild doesn’t seem to have the payoff that everyone else is claiming. Houston would lose a good coach who develops young guys well, the Wild still won’t make the playoffs, and there is the very real possibility that Yeo would be fired in 2 years.
Fair or not, there is tremendous pressure to make the playoffs. Fletcher needs to secure his job, because if this play continues over the span of 2 more years, he will be dismissed along with his coaching selections. I wouldn’t want Yeo to be dismissed just because the roster profusely inhales. Coaches tend to be the fall guy (we’ve witnessed this), and Yeo would be right in the crosshairs despite the fact that the talent on the roster is out of his hands.

by JDesthubert on Jun 7, 2011 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

So, what I am getting is you want to bring in a coach as a stop gap, to stop the bleeding, and then find someone else who can win a Cup later on? This is the main question facing the Wild. Do you want a coach who can take the situation and lead throughout the process, or do you want to hire another Jacques Lemaire, stifle the talent coming up in the name of making the playoffs?

It is as simple as that. Yeo = a coach who could be the guy who not only puts 1-0 wins on the board, but could take this team to a new level. Everyone else looks to be someone who can come in and replace Lemaire, and maybe make the playoffs.

Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN

Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.

by BReynolds on Jun 7, 2011 7:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Do you want a coach who can take the situation and lead throughout the process, or do you want to hire another Jacques Lemaire, stifle the talent coming up in the name of making the playoffs?

It is as simple as that.

Wow, those are really the only two options? That’s a pretty ludicrous statement to make.

But yes, I would prefer a stop gap. As I said above, it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to bring Yeo into a situation like this one. I don’t think I’m being unreasonable in saying he could be fired in 2 years if the Wild still aren’t in the playoffs. It did just happen to Todd Richards, who was brought into a similar situation. Yeo can’t lead through the process if he’s fired by the team.

*Note: I’m not saying Richards and Yeo are the same coach. I’m saying they would have similar situations, and as such, very similar expectations.

by JDesthubert on Jun 7, 2011 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Richards was fired because he lost the locker room, and the team free falled. If the team would have put up the same record and been consistant all year, Richards would probably be here still and it would be blamed on lack of talent. But when the team was all the way upto a fifth seed, than plummeted to 13th, the blame fell on Richards and he was canned.

by ThatGuy22 on Jun 8, 2011 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Todd Richards started last season on thin ice. Expectations were to make the playoffs. He became the fall guy when the team didn’t show any real improvement from the previous season.
To add to his list of woes, the sellout streak ended very early in the season. The team lost more money, and the FANS clamored for his head on a pike.
The expectations were incredibly high for Richards to win now while Fletcher tried to reload the talent pool for the future. The abysmal finish was the final nail in the coffin, but it wasn’t the only reason.

by JDesthubert on Jun 8, 2011 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Richards isn't to blame for the sellout streak ending though

Indirectly, maybe, but it was the on-ice product and the economy.

JS, Champion of the first ever Hockey Wilderness Playoff Bracket Challenge! WHOOOOOOOO!

Author, watchdog, enforcer and french-canadian connection for Hockey Wilderness.

twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Jun 8, 2011 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hence why I said he became the fall guy, not the cause of the problem.

by JDesthubert on Jun 8, 2011 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ludicrous? What other options do you see? The defensive minded coaches will kill the development of the offensive players Fletcher has drafted. The team might fight them now, but in three years, it won’t. Why bother hiring a coach knowing you have to fire them in three years? Very poor strategy.

The fact that you would prefer a stop gap coach tells me everything I need to know about the argument, and so I’m out. That is a terrible way to run a hockey team, and I cannot get on board with it.

Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN

Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.

by BReynolds on Jun 8, 2011 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think it’s ludicrous because a veteran coach who goes defense first isn’t always going to stifle development of players. The best coaches in the history of the NHL get their players to play defense first instead of offense first. Scotty Bowman taught his team the Left-Wing Lock and preached that great offense comes from controlling the neutral zone and playing sound team defense.
The Vancouver Canucks and the Boston Bruins play some of the best defense in the NHL. Boston isn’t a “high-scoring, razzle-dazzle” team, yet they’re playing for a Stanley Cup and their players are developing just fine. Even Tampa Bay, with all of their offensive might, were built and got into the playoffs based on a 1-3-1 defensive scheme. If you really believe that switching to an offensive first coach with an offensive first system is going to get the franchise anywhere, ask Washington how that approach works.
Even better idea, let’s ask Devils fans which coach they would want back for next year. John MacLean, who was supposed to unleash the offensive talent on the team, or Jacques Lemaire, who actually got the team to score goals while remaining stout defensively? Good players, even in a defensive-first system, are going to score. A defensive coach doesn’t necessarily mean that the prospects will suffer.
Now, I’m sorry that you don’t want to continue this discussion because you don’t personally agree with me. I think it’s a terrible strategy to hire a similar coach, bring him into a similar situation, and expect different results. Doesn’t mean I’m going to back out of the discussion.

by JDesthubert on Jun 8, 2011 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you ask me...

The reason Lemaire got the guys going in NJ is because the team was used to him, they were comfortable with him and also, he’s a near-legendary coach, so you can’t really compare him with Richards, or Maclean. Hitchcock is probably the closest to Lemaire a team could get.

I don’t agree however with the idea of a stop-gap coach. The team spent 2 years learning a new system, now you’re saying you want to bring in a coach as a stop-gap, which would mean 2-3 years, get another new system going and then change again over and over again? The team will never get anything done that way. I agree the best way to win now would be a Hitchcock, but if we want to build a perennial winner, we need someone like Yeo who’s familiar with the current roster and system and has experience with the young talent the Wild have. We can’t afford to hire someone who won’t trust the rookies, because they’re essentially all we’ve got. We need someone who’ll give the kids freedom, but also responsability and a good work ethic.

JS, Champion of the first ever Hockey Wilderness Playoff Bracket Challenge! WHOOOOOOOO!

Author, watchdog, enforcer and french-canadian connection for Hockey Wilderness.

twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Jun 8, 2011 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also

Brodeur played pretty much his entire career behind a defensive juggernaut, and then all of a sudden, his team becomes swiss cheese. NJ aren’t in the same situation the Wild are in. NJ actually have scoring talent to compliment the defensive system. We simply don’t.

JS, Champion of the first ever Hockey Wilderness Playoff Bracket Challenge! WHOOOOOOOO!

Author, watchdog, enforcer and french-canadian connection for Hockey Wilderness.

twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Jun 8, 2011 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Which is why I said that good players, even in a defensive system, will find ways to score goals. When the talent finally enters the system, the Wild should be able to score easier even if they play a defensive scheme.

by JDesthubert on Jun 8, 2011 9:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

But until the talent does enter, that doesn't do any good for us right now

JS, Champion of the first ever Hockey Wilderness Playoff Bracket Challenge! WHOOOOOOOO!

Author, watchdog, enforcer and french-canadian connection for Hockey Wilderness.

twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Jun 8, 2011 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I do want someone that will work well with the young talent, but said talent isn’t even in the farm system yet. Granlund et al are still doing their own, separate things. Bringing up Yeo to work with our youth right now isn’t even a real argument, because there’s not a lot of youth to work with. Gillies, Almond, and Wellman aren’t the top-6 forwards that need to be groomed. The Wild are still waiting for those potentials to come into the system.

by JDesthubert on Jun 8, 2011 9:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Now, I’m sorry that you don’t want to continue this discussion because you don’t personally agree with me. I think it’s a terrible strategy to hire a similar coach, bring him into a similar situation, and expect different results. Doesn’t mean I’m going to back out of the discussion.

This is exactly why I left the conversation. You are taking it personally, and I want no part of it. Enjoy a new coach that comes in a kills the development of the prospects. Ken Hitchcock with Nikita Filatov if you would like an example.

Just be careful what you wish for.

Editor:Hockey Wilderness Editor:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN

Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.

by BReynolds on Jun 9, 2011 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I tend to agree that Yeo appears to be more of the same (on paper)

And I still contend that Richards has a fantastic pedigree for head coaching success, but the style didn’t fit the personnel and he couldn’t show enough promise to give him enough latitude. He is not, however, the first coach to fail in his first stint because of a bad situation. Look at Bill Belichick in Cleveland. Then give him decent personnel and a little more experience, and suddenly he’s a genius.

Honestly, I wouldn’t be shocked if that’s what happens with Richards, which is why I’m not afraid to go the route with Yeo. That said, he’s not my number one choice.

Proprietor of Hockey Wilderness - We take Minnesota hockey WAY too seriously.

by nathaneide on Jun 8, 2011 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

The exact term that Fletcher used was...

Richards wasn’t the fit for the team. He wasn’t the right voice. It seemed to come down to the fact that Richards wasn’t able to man-manage the Wild, either in or out of the game. It didn’t come down to style as much as it came down to Richards not being able to get the most from his players or adapt to changes within a game. These are two things that Yeo has demonstrated in the past, and currently with the Aeros.

I really think Yeo might be the guy if the Wild are committed to reshaping this roster and the pressure to get to the playoffs, at least officially, comes off for the next year or two. If the FO is committed to winning with minimal roster change, then I think McTavish will be the pick.

by Krotz the Wall on Jun 7, 2011 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeo

The Richards failed experiment aside, I too think Yeo is our next coach…..now if he flames out we’ll also be getting a new GM.

by Pewterschmidt on Jun 7, 2011 4:58 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

I trust

Ms. Conduct’s assessment of Yeo even though I am sure he has some faults as a coach other than being bald. That said, what I am starting to like most about Yeo is he has experience in our minor league system, knows the players, knows the direction the franchise hopes to be going. Richards didn’t have that luxery as he was in another team’s system. If the Wild are truly going with a youth movement which is the trend of the NHL and you shouldn’t buck the trent, I’d say pick Yeo and as long as he doesn’t lose the room the way Richards did, he should be given more than two years. I would like to see him with some proven veteran assistants though like Rick Wilson and I wouldn’t be opposed to Therrien being an assistant too. If Yeo falters down the line, Therrien could probably step right in and save the season. I still think it is 50/50 Mac-T or Yeo but I am starting to firmly entrench myself in the Yeo camp.

by cgp711 on Jun 7, 2011 5:35 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your Minnesota Wild Blog Community

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Oh_kaption_my_kaption_small
State-O-D. How do our Defense-men look for next year?
Small
Jordan Staal?
Oh_kaption_my_kaption_small
Do the Wild have a shot at Parise or Nash?
Pumpkin_small
A Short 30 Team Analysis of Where Harding Could Go and Play as a #1 Goalie.
Logo-past-rochestermustangs_small
Shanahan and the Suspensions
Hawkwild_small
Former Minnesota Wild 2012 Stanley Cup Finals Dream Team
Small
Hardest thing to do in hockey?
Small
MN Wild's 2012 Draft Pick Watch #8:  AAAaghgahghgh!!!!!
Small
Hear me out...
Small
MN Wild's 2012 Draft Pick Watch #7: Who does #2 work for?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Chuck Fletcher

Twitter_profile_small nathaneide

Mike Yeo

297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small BReynolds

Darby Hendrickson, Daryl Sydor, Rick Wilson & Bob Mason

Mscon_bigger_small ms.conduct

Small bciskie

Granlund_small JDesthubert

N1282200019_30083840_3437_small elisebutler

Moose_stuff_small JSLandry

Avatar_small danccchan

Western-lg_small WCHBlog