Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Predictions

Role Playing: You're Chuck Fletcher

The story is one you all know. The Wild have two wins in the last 472 games, only have 1 goal in the last 17,254 shifts, can't fight their way out of a wet paper bag, and the goalies look an awful lot like Dan Cloutier. The wheels are off, the trail lost, the emotional breakdown in full effect. Nothing seems to work. So what do you do?

You are now suddenly Freaky Friday'd into Chuck Fletcher's body. You have complete and total control over the team that Mike Yeo has to work with. You decide who stays, who goes, who is on waivers, who to trade. No move is too big or too small for you to make. You have present day concerns to balance with future planning.

So, armchair experts (we're assuming you've seen the replay)... what do you do? The comment section has been filled with everything from trades of major pieces of the future to placing grizzled vets on waivers. You still have all of the no movements and no trade clauses, regular waiver rules, and all the other aspects of the CBA legalities to contend with. You have no one to answer to but Craig Leipold at this point.

What do you do, hot shot?

Comment 42 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

wait it out

Go back to the beginning of the season and see where a lot of people had us pegged. It wasn’t near the playoff order. If we have faith in our prospects, many of whom seem ready to contribute immediately (granlund, bulmer) then be content with every win we get but don’t sweat it. it’s a players league and we don’t have good enough players especially on defense.

the one move i would make it moving one of Harding/Backstrom. Hackett is ready to play and we have more goalies in the wings. See if we can get a D prospect for one of our goalies. That’s about it.

by lionelhutz on Jan 13, 2012 11:38 AM CST reply actions  

There is some validity in this position...

The Wild are looking like they will end up on the bubble, where expected. This is looking less like a year they will be among the NHL’s elite. They shouldn’t blow the team up to just squeak in the playoffs.

But it’s becoming easier for CF to see which FA’s get their walking papers at the end of the year.

Tweets @sotsohockey

by Justin J on Jan 13, 2012 11:53 AM CST up reply actions  

More than anything, Zanon needs to go. He’s been a liability on the ice, and now he’s coming off as a problem in the locker room. Maybe that’s just to the media, but hey, hold yourself accountable. True professionals don’t back down from a question. I don’t really care what we get in return, I’d just rather be giving time to Prosser, Scandella and even Lundin. They kids can grow. Zanon is just growing old.

I don’t know what you can do about our top six right now. I have no interest in giving away picks and prospects to fill a temporary void. I’d be happy to trade away Latendresse or Bouchard even if they were healthy, but no one is going to take them right now.

What we do have is a wealth of goalie depth. If we want something, like a top pairing defensemen or a top six forward, this is the well I think we can draw from. Harding deserves a shot at a #1 job, which will never happen behind Backstrom, and I think we can get a decent return on him. Hacket can fill in the rest of this year and if he does well, be the backup next year.

Other tradables: Brodziak is an asset we can give up. I love the guy but he’d get a good return that we can keep going forward. If we need some pucks, trade Staubitz. We could stand to give up one of our young D men. Stoner is the most likely candidate. It would be great to ditch Zidlicky too, but he has that pesky no trade clause.

What I really want is it to be next season already. Granlund and the rest of the kids are going to shake up this team and it is going to be fun to watch.

by Jonsey on Jan 13, 2012 11:41 AM CST reply actions  

I like your thinking.

I’d offer Tampa bay Harding + Zanon for Ryan Malone.

"90% of the game is physical. The other half is mental." - Yogi Berra

by cyroose on Jan 13, 2012 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Might need an exchange of picks as well, but overall I like the deal.

by eamon17 on Jan 13, 2012 1:23 PM CST up reply actions  

That could be a sticking point. What pick would you offer? Tampa gets WIld’s 2nd round pick and Wild gets Tampa’s 3rd rounder?

This is when Fletcher will have to question the cost/benefit of possibly making the playoffs this year vs. building the team 2 and 3 years down the road. The team could sure use a playoff berth, even if they don’t go far, but you also definitely do not want to mortgage the future. Maybe they could throw in Lundin or Stoner to the deal as well and keep the picks? I wonder how Tampa would feel about this: Harding + Zanon + Stoner for Malone

"90% of the game is physical. The other half is mental." - Yogi Berra

by cyroose on Jan 13, 2012 1:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd be good with that

Just didn’t think Harding +1 would necessarily be enough to land Malone. Maybe they want Lundin back. He already knows their system…

by eamon17 on Jan 13, 2012 1:31 PM CST up reply actions  

If they wanted Lundin, they would have re-signed him.

by Jonsey on Jan 13, 2012 1:59 PM CST up reply actions  

you take for granted what you have

Their Defense this year has been awful, not out of the question they miss his veteran presence.

by ThatGuy22 on Jan 13, 2012 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Arbtiration issues were the cause

I don’t think they didn’t want him, per se.

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.

Twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Jan 13, 2012 2:09 PM CST up reply actions  

This

And a lot of folks over at Raw Charge would be delighted to have him back. Just an idea.

by eamon17 on Jan 13, 2012 2:11 PM CST up reply actions  

It's easy to see in retrospect...

But if Fletch moved Zanon a month ago, there would’ve been more value in the deal.

Just odd that waiting to act is the hallmark of the previous regime, not Fletcher.

Here’s a link to 2012 FA’s, who would make a good rental?
http://www.capgeek.com/free_agents.php?year_id=2012&team_id=-1&position_id=F&fa_type_id=2

How much should CF give up?

Tweets @sotsohockey

by Justin J on Jan 13, 2012 11:51 AM CST reply actions  

If there’s anyone we should go after, it’s Ruutu. Slide him in with Koivu and Heatly, then put Seto back with Wellman and Cullen. I think our top 6 would look good then. The problem is I think they will want too much for him, and there’s no guarentee he re-signs for next season. If we can trade UFA for UFA, awesome, but I think Carolina needs to stockpile picks and prospects, and that’s something we shouldn’t be giving up.

by Jonsey on Jan 13, 2012 11:57 AM CST up reply actions  

It’s just a matter of time for trading Harding but after that I don’t think we are that deep in goalies. Hackett should be solid but Kuemper and Endras seem like average prospects and Gustafsson seemed pretty bad for most of the world juniors.
I wouldn’t want to trade any of our quality prospects especially just to try to fix this year.
We’re going to need to save our cap space if we’re going to throw money at Parise.
We all love Brodziak but there won’t be room for him soon and he’ll have to go.
For this year I don’t think Fletch should do much. We are lacking talent but that will come in the next few years. We just need to change our f-ing additude.

by HonorableH on Jan 13, 2012 11:59 AM CST reply actions  

No Offense

But your wrong in the We are no deep in goalies.

Kuemper may be a better prospect than Hackett, and has done nothing but put up phenomenal stats everywhere he has been the last two years(His stats are better than Hacketts in Houston). Hackett is the starter because he has more experience, and thats pretty much it.

Endras was also putting up good stats in Houston, and has been lights out in SM-Liiga after we loaned him to relieve some of the log jam for the year.(Sporting a 1.91 GAA, .936 Save Percentage, and 8-3-1 record).

As for Gustafsson, I am more inclined to look at the 20+ game sample size where he has a 1.99 GAA and .919 save percentage against men, than the 5 game sample size in the WJC, where he had a couple week games but than shutout the Russians in Gold Medal game.

by ThatGuy22 on Jan 13, 2012 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Tough one... tough one.

I just got done writing something similar to this in the Let’s Talk Trade Targets.

There is a dual weight here.

1. The fact that the Wild have not made it to the playoffs in 3 years, I’m on my second coach, and the team has issues filling the arena when things aren’t going well, puts a lot of pressure on me to WIN NOW. Make a trade or two, and demonstrate the desire and ability to get to the playoffs… where money is made and fans feel justified for spending their money all season. The extremely hot start to the season merely amps up the pressure on this side of the coin. Missing the playoffs will be seen even more negatively. Recent history is also not on your side as the team hasn’t really done anything at the trade deadline recently… either selling off pending free agents or making a trade to actually help the team fight for a playoff position. (*I am just pretending that trade for a certain Chicago ‘defender’ didn’t happen.)

2. The other reality is that the vast bulk of my top prospects will be filtering into the pros and possibly the NHL roster in the next 2 years:
Granlund (NHL next year)
Larsson (AHL/NHL next year)
Brodin (AHL/NHL next year)
Bulmer (NHL next year)
Coyle (AHL next year)
Zucker (AHL next year)
Phillips (AHL next year, NHL the year after)
My team has been on a fast train out of the playoffs for the past month. I have a lot of players in a contract year:
Latendresse (RFA) (Injured)
Brodziak (UFA)
Wellman (RFA)
Staubitz (UFA)
Nick Johnson (RFA)
Zanon (UFA)
Lundin (UFA)
Falk (RFA)
Stoner (UFA)
Harding (UFA)

I have cap room, even if the cap is lowered in a new CBA for next season. There will be a new CBA next season.

The best Wild team is still obviously the future potential Wild of 2 or 3 years from now. I won’t sacrifice that to chase a playoff spot that might be quickly fading. I won’t trade Koivu or Granlund. I probably don’t want to trade Setoguchi, or probably Shultz… not that I could with his price tag. I probably won’t be able to trade Zidlicky, Bouchard, Backstrom, Heatley, or Cullen.

Plan of action:

1. I start working the phones trying to find a nice rental player that wouldn’t cost any of the core from a team mostly looking to dump some salary for something heading into the off season. (Assets to use: 2012 2nd rd, Harding, Zucker)

2. If nothing happens on point 1, I have to make a hard decision on Brodziak. I like the guy. I want him on my team. I have center depth coming, am stuck with Cullen for another year. I realize that a high-functioning 3rd line center that adds secondary scoring, face off wins, and the ability to play up or down and on special teams depending on circumstances… these guys sometimes bring back decent hauls at trade deadline. I try to sign him for 3 years at a pretty reasonable rate. If he doesn’t want to do that now, I work to trade him.

3. I do my best to move Harding and 2 d men… Zanon and one of Lundin or Stoner.

4. I’m looking for returns of younger guys looking to try to make their mark, picks… anything but a higher priced older player with a year or more left on the contract. Guys to fill AHL spots to let some Aeros up would be just fine.

Play mostly for the future but try my damnedest to end the season in the playoffs. Having Lats and Bouchard hurt and out indefinitely really hurts my flexibility both in trying to trade and spur this team on to the play offs, to trade the margins and still be competitive, having some additional trade chips.

Seto-Koivu-Heatley
Wellman-Cullen-Clutter
Johnson-Brodziak-Powe
Gillies – Almond – Stuabitz

Schultz – Scandella
Spurgeon – Falk
Prosser – Ludin/Stoner

Backstrom
Hackett

The reality for the Wild is that they will have a lot of cap space, prospects, and open spots at the end of this year. They are positioned well to be a player in FA, in trades, and could quite possibly end up with a higher pick in the 1st round than anyone wanted. I try to make some minor moves, shuffle some things around, move some D, and then I sit tight and try to have another great off season.

by Krotz the Wall on Jan 13, 2012 12:12 PM CST reply actions  

Brett Bulmer

I may be wrong on this, but I am thinking Bulmer doesn’t make the NHL club next year. Granted he almost stayed this year as a 3rd/4th liner, but that was because he couldn’t go to the AHL. I am thinking they will be more inclined to send him to the AHL where he can play larger top 6 minutes and see if he can continue to develop his offensive game like he has been in the WHL.

by ThatGuy22 on Jan 13, 2012 12:36 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know

I feel like he’s not supposed to be top 6 material. His game seems built better for 3rd-4th line duty, which he had performed admirably during his cup o’ tea early in the season. Maybe it’s just me though..

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.

Twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Jan 13, 2012 12:53 PM CST up reply actions  

And that may be true

He does have that look about him from what we saw, but his game is growing in the WHL increasing his PPG from .85 last year to 1.35 this year.

Would it be wise to pigeon hole him as a 3rd liner with out giving him the shot? He is obviously not going to get it in the NHL next year with Cullen, PMB, Koivu, Seto, Heatley all signed and Lats an RFA, not to mention Granlund coming in.

I say send him to the AHL with Coyle, Larsson, Phillips, Zucker(if he comes out) and Let them all grow together. Maybe his development continues in the scoring area and adds another potential option. If his scoring stalls out, the rest of his game will likely remain and he than is what he is.

by ThatGuy22 on Jan 13, 2012 12:59 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't buy it.

If the kid can earn a spot on the 3rd line, you let him play it. You see what the competition, speed, and opportunity of the NHL can shape the kid into. He isn’t a scoring line or bust prospect like Wellman. It’s also true that the best gritty top 6 players, started on the third lines and worked their way onto scoring lines.

Besides, if you’ve got Granlund playing center on the second line, I don’t know that you don’t have Cullen playing center on the third. I wouldn’t be all that surprised if Lats isn’t back next year. Who is to say that second line minutes aren’t available next year. I’d like to see the kid in the NHL and in position to fight to be considered for those shots. In my book, he already proved that he CAN play in the NHL and fit an important role. Let’s see him build on that… rather chase a potential, with a whole lot of other new AHLers.

by Krotz the Wall on Jan 13, 2012 1:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I do wonder what they are going to do with the Center position

I am wondering if they don’t start Granlund out at wing and ease him in with less responsibility while Cullen finishes out his contract on the 2nd line.

It also wouldn’t surprise me if Lats isn’t back, but it probably won’t be because they don’t resign him. If he is not traded before the season, im willing to bet he is gone during the season at some point.

by ThatGuy22 on Jan 13, 2012 1:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Funny how

2 years ago.. hell, not even two years, the big problem was a lack of depth at center… now they seem to have too much!

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.

Twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Jan 13, 2012 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course

It’s a good problem to have :P

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.

Twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Jan 13, 2012 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree.

I see his progression arc something like Clutterbuck’s. Get him in and see if he can make a 3rd line spot his own. Grit, speed, secondary scoring. Then you see if he can force his way into that middle 6 consideration… like Clutterbuck is now. I’m certainly not for rushing any prospect to the NHL. However, when you have a guy who CAN play in the NHL and can get more than 10 minutes a night, I don’t know that you do the kid any favors by constantly sheltering him by chasing a the ‘rabbit that is a top 6 scorer AND a grit player’. The best ones always play their way into it. The key being if he can earn and keep a regular position on that 3rd line.

If you think of it this way:
Staubitz = gone
Gillies = in the doghouse and not all that great
Brodziak = probably not on the team next year

I’d be willing to see what Nick Johnson and Brett Bulmer can bring next year.

by Krotz the Wall on Jan 13, 2012 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Another thing to consider with Bulmer

Last year, who among young bucks did he have to outplay? Phillips and thats really it.

Next year in Camp he atleast going to have Coyle, Phillips, Larsson and possibly Zucker. A lot more competition. He very well could make the team, but I dont think a spot is going to be handed to him because he got 9 games in this year.

by ThatGuy22 on Jan 13, 2012 1:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Then again

Of all the players you named, only Bulmer would actually fit well in 3rd-4th line duty.

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.

Twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Jan 13, 2012 1:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Larsson could fit very well there for a season, as he by all accounts is considered a very responsible defensive player, with scoring pop and has been playing with Men for 3 years. So he could fit there, Zucker has been called a 3rd/2nd type.

I’m not saying Bulmer won’t make the team, but I think there is going to be a lot of competition next year in training camp. Should be very exciting.

ps:Is it wierd that I am all of a sudden wanting the season to be over and next years training camp started…

by ThatGuy22 on Jan 13, 2012 1:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, I guess it makes sense

The thing is, maybe Zucker would benefit more from a year in the AHL to play with men and Larsson a year in the NHL to adapt to North American play.

I'm that ''ignorant dumbass'' who writes with the ''whiny idiot homer'' over at Hockey Wilderness.

Twitter: BubbleWild48

by JSLandry on Jan 13, 2012 1:38 PM CST up reply actions  

First

I would trade Zanon and Harding. Both are expendable and could bring some assets back. I would think for a 2nd rounder this next year and run (especially since GMCF has given it up again). This team needs help but that is in the pipeline.
Second.
I would resign Brodziak in March after the deadline. He is good but could be moved for pieces as well. This team is okay but not great. I would prefer to resign him but a young hungry AHLer could make the jump at a cheaper price and be just as good.
Third.
Double the amount of scouting in AHL and younger leagues. We have greatly improved our drafting over he who shall remain nameless but I believe that scouting is what will lead to victories. Good teams always find the unwanted player or late pick that turns into a star. If you can identify them early and on other teams systems you can move your vets when you are struggling for young talent. That was the Twins system and lead to many great players.
Fourth and last.
Entertain trade talks for anyone. Some GM will try to make a splash and then if you have done 3 you can ask for the young guys you think will make it the other team is skeptical on and get them thrown in as an extra. If they work great if not it was a secondary pick.

don't feed the trolls

by Hagendas on Jan 13, 2012 1:11 PM CST reply actions  

1. Add a young beast of a winger… Evander Kane.

Latendresse(When healthy), Zucker and a pick

2. Then look to add more talent to the blue line, quality needed, not quantity. Phoenix makes a lot of sense, with their blue chip defenders.

Something along the lines of Bulmer and PMB for OEL

3. Trade Harding and Zanon

by Kingpin45 on Jan 13, 2012 2:49 PM CST reply actions  

Players

It certainly is a tough situation for CF. The prospects all seem to be coming up around the same time. One prospect I’m very excited about is Charlie Coyle. Yes, he left BU, but now he can concentrate on playing hockey. I have no numbers to back this up, but it seems like CHL players fare a lot better in the NHL than US college hockey players. Half of a season in the CHL could be good for him.

I think with Lats out now and probably gone after the season, Coyle will fit right in on the first line. He is a great net front presence for the first line, allowing Koivu to work down low, and Heatley to stay up in the slot. He scores from the crease, and is no slouch in setting up his linemates either. Also, he is good when working down low.

I think he will be on the team next year, patrolling the front of the enemy crease.

by Joel Bertelsen on Jan 13, 2012 3:37 PM CST reply actions  

It's all debatable...

But I think you’ll see Granlund the Great on the top line before you’d see Coyle. I can see Coyle and Setoguchi skating on either side of Cullen on the 2nd, though.

Proud Sioux Falls Stampede Season Ticket Holder and #1 Nate Prosser Fan! Go Wild!

by wild4life on Jan 13, 2012 3:59 PM CST up reply actions  

It is all debatable

I think it’s better to divide our scoring talents, that way no team can focus entirely on one line.

Granlund, Koivu, and Heatley will be our biggest scoring threats (most likely).

A Heatley-Koivu-Coyle line allows all of them to do what they’re best at. Plus, they’re all big bodies and can throw their weight around and protect the puck well.

A Granlund-Cullen-Seto line is a fast, skilled line. Granlund and Cullen are good puck movers and Seto can shoot or be in front of the net.

Both lines would be scoring threats. Also, not always playing against top d-men and forwards could be good for Granlund as he adjusts to the speed, skill, and physicality (one of my all time favorite words) of the NHL. Just my thoughts, though.

by Joel Bertelsen on Jan 13, 2012 4:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok, after a lot of thought

If I’m Chuck Fletcher, I don’t make a lot of moves. Outside of dealing Harding away for something, I don’t really believe that making moves is going to benefit the team. Add into the equation that the Wild are still a team with few tradable assets means that they’re not really sellers either.
I know that fans want to see Zanon and Lundin dealt, but let’s be honest with ourselves:
Zanon and his poor play and demeanor aren’t winning over suitors. He’s not versatile at all and he’s not a guy you rebuild around, so the trade options are limited.
With Stoner and Lundin, you get two defensmen that give you very little offensively. Maybe Ottawa takes one of the two to fix their blueline problems, but they’re really not rare and coveted prospects. Plus, Lundin is continually a healthy scratch on a team that’s having serious defensive problems.

I don’t necessarily want to deal picks or prospects. I already don’t have a 2nd round pick this year after packaging the pick and Burns to San Jose. Giving up my 3rd round pick just limits my options even more.
In a perfect world, I’m shopping Harding for a 2nd and either Lundin or Stoner for a 3rd. If I can add two picks, I’ll be fairly happy.
I don’t want to add pieces because the current roster isn’t in the right frame of mind to win anyway. Adding one more winger doesn’t change that mentality. There’s no confidence in the locker room. I hired Yeo for a reason, and now he has to show why I hired him. If he can get the team running again before the deadline, then I’ll look at a deal to add a piece to help out, but until Yeo can get the team pointing in the right direction, adding another player just seems like trying to cover a wildfire with a blanket.

You know you're a Wild fan if Spam Whoopie Gerald-buns comes up in conversation
Regressing all the way back to high school hockey.
Mikael Granlund = Suomi Savior

by JDesthubert on Jan 13, 2012 4:59 PM CST reply actions  

If I am CF . . .

I go all in on a defensive rebuild by letting our kids play and getting anything I could for Zanon, Zidlichky, Schultz, and Backstom . I really don’t think our defense would suffer all that much by losing any or all of them

by MrPuckhead on Jan 13, 2012 5:32 PM CST reply actions  

I’m not necessarily saying that you’re wrong, but don’t you think that letting the kids get shelled like that would totally ruin any type of development they have? I’m assuming your six defensmen would be (in no particular order) Scandella, Falk, Stoner, Spurgeon, Prosser, and Lundin.

I would just like to point out that the Wild tried just rushing kids into the system and they ended up with James Sheppard and Colton Gillies. Is it really wise to jeopardize the entire blueline of the future just to “let the kids play”?

You know you're a Wild fan if Spam Whoopie Gerald-buns comes up in conversation
Regressing all the way back to high school hockey.
Mikael Granlund = Suomi Savior

by JDesthubert on Jan 13, 2012 5:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I think that D-men are much less suseptible to being “ruined” in this manner than forwards. Highly drafted offensive players feel extreme pressure to score and there is no way to relieve that pressure except to score . . . and more often than not they blame themselves and not their linemates if they don’t. D-men do feel feel pressure, but not to the same degree as forwards because there is absolutely no pressure to score and if you do screw up your fellow d-man can bail you out and all is forgiven. Scandella currently feels pressure because he is putting pressure on himself to live up to the billing of being the next Burns. The others, sot so much.

by MrPuckhead on Jan 13, 2012 6:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Just to clarify my point . . .

I try trade our older d-men (plus Backstrom) not to fix the defense but to gain additional offense

by MrPuckhead on Jan 14, 2012 8:48 AM CST up reply actions  

That IS ignoring that fact that

Zidlicky and Backstrom are paid a lot of money and have NO TRADE clauses. Schultz, who makes a good deal of money for a defensive defender, is also probably not movable for anything that would get you real offense and would certainly hurt the defensive structure of the team.

by Krotz the Wall on Jan 17, 2012 9:02 AM CST up reply actions  

But I'm not convinced the defense is what needs fixing right now.

In my opinion, any and all help that Fletcher can give needs to go to the offense. In the beginning of the season, we were winning because of good defense. All the pieces to that particular puzzle are still there, they just need to get back their confidence and gain some momentum. The problem that the Wild have had all season is the lack of offense. We have been consistently in the bottom of the NHL in scoring, and that’s not gonna cut it, no matter who’s in the net/defending. Lets face it, the defensive screwups wouldn’t be as noticeable if we could score more than 1-2 times per game.

If I were Fletcher, I would package Harding in as pretty of a package as possible, and ship him out. Possibly to Tampa, they showed interest, and they could use the defense. See if we could get Malone, that would be a pretty nice boost. Stick him on probably the 2nd line with Cullen and Wellman, and recommend to Yeo to stop juggling lines around so much, so they can gel a bit. Then I would find a place to stick Zanon, it’s obvious that he’s not a fit on the team anymore, but with his current actions, all we’d pretty much get is ‘future considerations’ for him too. Maybe think about dealing another one of our goalies (it would be a risk, but I think it would pay off. Hackett and Kuemper seem to be as solid as they come, so far) So maybe we can find a new home for Endras? His numbers are pretty decent in Finland, and while I don’t pretend to know how set other teams are on goalie prospects, there could be a spot for him somewhere, possibly in New Jersey?

by Rhomy777 on Jan 14, 2012 12:30 AM CST up reply actions  

I needed to take some time to think this over before posting my plan.

If I’m Fletch, I start making moves now for next year. Instead of treating this like a fantasy, I am going to be as realistic as possible. I’m not sure how many MLB fans are on here but I am going to use an example that happened a couple years ago to make my case. A couple years back, the Arizona D-backs traded their ace at the time, Dan Haren, to the Angels at the deadline even though the Angels had no shot at winning that year. Many questioned this move on both sides. The Angels came out and said they were making the move so they could compete the following year. I think this is what Fletch should do right now. We can still make the playoffs this year but I think we have seen far too many holes to make any impact. So in no particular order, here is what I do.

1. Make a decision on Brodziak, either sign or trade. If you sign him, great, versitle player with a greater defensive upside. If you trade him, get what you can and then make plans to acquire Frans Nielsen. Not exactly the same type of third line center as Brodziak but nonetheless comparable with more of an offensive upside instead of defensive.

2. Acquire a puck moving defenseman. I have said this before and it is hard for me to say again, but Harrison Mooney was right in his critique of our defense earlier this year. That pains me to say because I blasted him pretty good at the time. All of our defensement right now are pretty vanilla. Scandella has a bright future, but I think with the rest, what you see is what you got. We can’t have a team of just 4-6 defensemen, we need someone who can control the puck in all zones, has a little poise (the biggest problem right now is they all panic and chip the puck like crazy), and can start the breakout. People need to realize that we are not getting Shea Weber this off-season, he is a RFA and Fletch would be crazy to sign him to an offer sheet and crazy to give up the prospects necessary to land him. I for one am in the camp that thinks Weber and Suter go someplace together and probably stay in Nashville as boring as that is. I am going to use Joni Pitkanen as my example of the TYPE of player Fletch needs to target right now. He’s still pretty young, very established, proven track record, he’s a Finn (and we all love those), puck mover, poised, decent production, honestly a lot like Kim Johnsson. A player like this is going to cost a little in terms of trade and we will be picking up salary too, but he would help now and definitely help next year as well. Fletch tried this in acquiring Cam Barker, he swung and missed. Much better sample size from Pitkanen, I don’t like trading for young d-men because most still have not found their game.

3. Move on from Latendresse this off-season. Unless he agrees to a two-way contract which he would never do, it is time to cut the cord here. I am a huge Lats fan, but we have enough concussion-prone/injury-prone players, if we can get rid of one at no cost, I say do it. It’s not his fault but unfortunately we can’t be paying for a guy to be injured for a whole season year after year. We are stuck with Bouchard (again big fan but not really worth what he makes). If Butch had not gotten hurt, maybe he has some trade value this off-season, but he’s hurt and we need to ride out his contract.

4. Demote Zidlicky. He has a NTC but that is not a no-movement clause, he can go to the minors. That would serve as a wakeup call or at leat convince him to waive his NTC. Or we put him on re-entry waivers and someone maybe claims him on half his salary. I am ready to move on from this guy, I liked the move at the time but he does not fit in Yeo’s system.

5. Do not fire Yeo and point to your drafting to save your own job. Fans are inpatient, maybe rightfully so. But the reason this team sucks is not Fletch or Yeo’s fault, it’s DR’s. He set this team back about 10 years with his mismanagement and we are still crawling out of that hole he dug.

6. Other than acquiring Nielsen if you move on from Brodziak, do not make any forward moves for this season, save the cash for Parise this summer. Not the most popular opinion in any way, but why trade for an expensive veteran forward who can only pot a max of 25 goals when you can just sign a superstar this summer and not give up any assets? I think most people are underestimating Parise’s chances of coming here. The reality is that Russo was on Puck Daddy Radio earlier this week and said the Wild will throw the world at Parise and JP is almost encouraging his son to come here. He just bought a new house in Orono or something like that, it is worth not making moves now to save the cash and prospects to see if we can get him for nothing on July 1st. Make back up plans like Ruutu if that doesn’t happen July 1st, but the focus should be improving the defense through trade, not the offense through trade.

7. Move Josh Harding and Greg Zanon for whatever you can. There stock is falling the more we lose and we will lose them both for nothing sooner rather than later. Take the second round pick for Harding and the fourth for Zanon and move on.

8. Whatever you do, do not break up the core prospects or make a trade for the sake of making a trade. We do not need another Barker or Kobasew on this team. Like I said at the beginning, make moves for next year and focus on the areas that will be hard to address in FA and where you are light on stud prospects (defense).

by cgp711 on Jan 14, 2012 10:32 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your Minnesota Wild Blog Community

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Oh_kaption_my_kaption_small
State-O-D. How do our Defense-men look for next year?
Small
Jordan Staal?
Oh_kaption_my_kaption_small
Do the Wild have a shot at Parise or Nash?
Pumpkin_small
A Short 30 Team Analysis of Where Harding Could Go and Play as a #1 Goalie.
Logo-past-rochestermustangs_small
Shanahan and the Suspensions
Hawkwild_small
Former Minnesota Wild 2012 Stanley Cup Finals Dream Team
Small
Hardest thing to do in hockey?
Small
MN Wild's 2012 Draft Pick Watch #8:  AAAaghgahghgh!!!!!
Small
Hear me out...
Small
MN Wild's 2012 Draft Pick Watch #7: Who does #2 work for?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Chuck Fletcher

Twitter_profile_small nathaneide

Mike Yeo

297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small BReynolds

Darby Hendrickson, Daryl Sydor, Rick Wilson & Bob Mason

Mscon_bigger_small ms.conduct

Small bciskie

Granlund_small JDesthubert

N1282200019_30083840_3437_small elisebutler

Moose_stuff_small JSLandry

Avatar_small danccchan

Western-lg_small WCHBlog