Weekly Wild Update: Week of 1-9-2012
Anyone still around? We have scheduled stops at all major intersections for you to get off the bandwagon, should you so choose. No one wants to jump off while it is still moving, right? That would just be painful.
The Wild are not doing well. Understatement, to be sure, but also very true. The ability for us to ignore the "see I told you so" posts from around the web has been tested, and yet thus far it has been accomplished. Notice that, once again, the Corsi and Fenwick numbers haven't changed much, but now the team is losing. Perhaps something else changed? Nah. Can't be.
Also note that 20 and 30 games weren't a large enough sample size to draw conclusions from, but the last 15 are a plenty big enough sample to do so. It all just makes so much sense.
Moving on. Let's take a look at last week and the week ahead.
Last Week
At this rate, we made to install Jagermeister on tap here at Hockey Wilderness to suppress the memories of the weeks as they pass by. The number of games that have been completely forgettable is growing, and like last year, no one seems to have an answer as to how to right the ship. Not good.
A completely embarrassing performance against the Canucks and a solid 15 minutes of hockey against the Flames led to another winless week. It also saw the Wild fall to being just one point from being outside the playoff race. The players are healthy, the system hasn't changed... they just need to start playing hockey again and quit with the emotional breakdown.
The Week Ahead
Tuesday should be a fun one for Wild fans as Brent Burns comes back to the X for the first time since being traded. He has admitted this one will be tougher than when the Wild stopped by his new pond, and it is obvious the reason why. If the roof doesn't cave in with the standing ovation the fans give him for his years of play here, it will be an insult to the fanbase. Don't miss this one, folks.
After their short stay at home, the Wild head back on the road for games that, in their current state of mind, will be huge challenges. They get the Blackhawks on Thursday, and the Blues on Saturday. The Hawks are dangerous for all of the obvious reasons. The Blues are dangerous because Ken Hitchcock has turned them into a lethal force that does nothing but win.
The week ahead is a huge challenge for a team being called "fragile," not playing aggressive enough, and seemingly completely lost in the world. This could be the knockout blow, or it could be the time everyone points to and says, "That's when they rediscovered their game."
Which shall it be?
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Boy
it would sure be nice if I could actually watch the game tomorrow night…
But nooooo…they need to put the game on a channel up in the 10,000’s on VS or NBC Sports or whatever the hell they call it.
"Believe in the system. For it shall bring light when there is dark, food when there is hunger, and shots when there are passes. This is the divine process." Yeo 4:18
Is it really that hard...
To type in 68 instead of 28 on your remote? Or 603 instead of 668 if you’re on DirecTV?
I don't have the channel
it’s really hard to pay even more for, essentially, one channel
"Believe in the system. For it shall bring light when there is dark, food when there is hunger, and shots when there are passes. This is the divine process." Yeo 4:18
My cable provider didn't offer Versus and now won't offer NBC Sports
Not sure what happened with my previous post. But thank you Wild.com for free live game audio,
To both you and NorthernStar
That’s pretty lame that your providers won’t supply the channel.
You know you're a Wild fan if Spam Whoopie Gerald-buns comes up in conversation
Regressing all the way back to high school hockey.
Mikael Granlund = Suomi Savior
What providers, where?
I’m with JD, it’s pretty lame. We now have DirecTV at our home, less than cable and has NBCSN and NHL network, so great.
(Though I’ll admit, that little spat with FSN wasn’t too enchanting).
KO coming
We’re going to need the looming NHL lockout to forget about this season…
Being from Minnesota, it would be rude to put something clever here.
Not sure why you're so convinced there's going to be a lockout
The NHL and NHLPA are smart enough to avoid another lockout. Realistically, if they lockout again, the NHL would just be better off disbanding. It’s not going to happen just because the NHLPA rejected the realignment. You’re jumping off the deep end rather quickly.
You know you're a Wild fan if Spam Whoopie Gerald-buns comes up in conversation
Regressing all the way back to high school hockey.
Mikael Granlund = Suomi Savior
Donald Fehr
Really, my belief in a works stoppage begins and ends with him. Even before this latest development I have felt the NHL could lose some of next year. I remember baseball in ’94…
Being from Minnesota, it would be rude to put something clever here.
Agree...
We may not lose a whole season again, but it’s easy to see the sides are nowhere near each other. An 82 game season seems quite unlikely.
it’s easy to see the sides are nowhere near each other
How do you come up with this assessment? Negotiations haven’t even started yet for the CBA.
You know you're a Wild fan if Spam Whoopie Gerald-buns comes up in conversation
Regressing all the way back to high school hockey.
Mikael Granlund = Suomi Savior
But that’s only one CBA that Fehr was involved in. The 2002 and 2007 CBAs went off without a hitch, which were both under the watch of Donal Fehr.
As for the 1994 MLB strike, the owners were at major fault. They wanted heavily reduced salaries and benefits for players. It was the players that wanted the strike. To just blame it all on Fehr as a blanket cause isn’t necessarily factually correct.
You know you're a Wild fan if Spam Whoopie Gerald-buns comes up in conversation
Regressing all the way back to high school hockey.
Mikael Granlund = Suomi Savior
I really don't think there will be a stoppage.
The last one really hurt the game for a while and considering the renaissance that has transpired since it is truly amazing. There is going to be give and take on both sides and some serious adjustments to things. I think it will be difficult but I think they will come to terms before we lose another season. A stumbling block may be the front-loaded contracts and the one-time, penalty-free contract buyout of sorts that is being discussed. I haven’t made my mind up about that one. I don’t think stupid GMs should be able to get out of their own mistakes so easily (see Lou Lamoriello) but it would be nice to see more trade/free agent action take place if some teams can get out of these deals.
It seems that the Winnipeg game
completely tore our heart out.
@JayKlinkhammer
jayklinkhammer.tumblr.com
Not necessarily true
The Wild came back the very next night and put up a pretty good fight against a Blackhawks team that was on fire.
The loss of Koivu started a tailspin that really shattered the confidence of everyone on the team, especially the younger players.
You know you're a Wild fan if Spam Whoopie Gerald-buns comes up in conversation
Regressing all the way back to high school hockey.
Mikael Granlund = Suomi Savior
Which doesn't make sense because it shouldn't have
It was just a close game that didn’t go their way. Sure it was ugly, but that happens over 82 games. Big deal, move on.
I was thinking about something last night… I have absolutely no information, conjecture, rumor, or bat shit insane theory to back this up, but it is something I thought about after a discussion at work about “motivation.” It is no secret Yeo was not happy after the Jets game. I’m wondering if he happened to servery chew their ass after that game in a manner that may not have been as productive for the team as he originally intended. As I’ve, ahem, been reminded recently, “yelling for yelling’s sake isn’t going to get the job done any better.” In fact, it will end up worse in the end.
Now I wonder, are they not sure how to get back to what Yeo wants and what is needed for this team to win because of that [presumably over] reaction? Maybe even worse case: he has lost the vets and his leadership? I realize those are some extreme conclusions, but it is where I went nonetheless. I don’t believe what I’m thinking is exactly what is happening, but something did happen after that game because I could see it against Chicago the next night (Koivu wasn’t hurt until the end of that one), and it is the same crap we’ve been seeing for the last month.
Other than that, yeah, the Koivu injury once again caused this team to lose its collective shit and the simplest explanation is probably the correct one.
Being from Minnesota, it would be rude to put something clever here.
The team went under when Koivu got hurt.
Irreplaceable on this team right now. They were in the game against Chicago and then he got hurt at the way end, we lost in the SO and the ensuing misery took place. They got out of their style of playing against the Jets but were still in it. They corrected a lot of that against the Blackhawks and then Koivu goes down and the team collapses. Just like last year. I don’t think there is much more to look at when it comes to why they started to lose after he went out. Why they continued to lose for so long even after he returned is another story . . . .

by 


















