Minnesota Wild at the Deadline: Which Prospect Can Be Moved?
The NHL trade deadline is only a week away and once again the Minnesota Wild is in limbo. That unfortunate place where the team is still in the playoff race but bad enough miss it all together and end up with a mediocre pick in the first round.
Should we push for the playoffs or should we start selling?
Lets pretend we decide to bring in some warm NHL bodies to the roster. To do so, some prospects will need to be let go. For once in Wild history, the prospect pool had enough depth to trade away some youngsters without hurting the team.
Why is he available: The Minnesota Wild has had a history of developing goaltenders. There just hasn't been a single season without at least one solid goalie. Manny Fernandez, Dwayne Roloson, Nklas Backstrom, Josh Harding, and now developing is Matt Hackett, Darcy Kuemper and Johan Gustafsson.
Hackett is considered the most NHL-ready out of all of them but Kuemper and Gustafsson each have their own impressive resumes.
Where he might go: Columbus might be team looking to sell as well as have a lack of top goaltending prospects. The Devils have Scott Wedgewood, another Plymouth Whaler product, but with all the talks of Zidlicky, could help replace an aging Broduer.
What he might be worth: Probably not much alone due to the popular trend of acquiring hot but cheap goaltenders (sounds weird I know...). However, if I had to value him, I would say a 2nd/3rd pick. He's talented but again, he's a goaltender and goalies are the hardest to value.
Other considerations: Hackett is only one of the many talented goaltenders in the Wild system. Any of them are expendable.
The bottom line: I don't see any of these prospects traded by themselves but will make very nice complimentary trade pieces.
Why is he available: He really isn't, but for the first time, the Minnesota Wild has good depth within the organization. This allows the team to trade away prospects and still be solid enough to be competitive.
Charlie Coyle is one of the more talented forward prospects the Wild have, and while any other forward prospect could be in this article, Coyle just my personal odd one out. Jason Zucker was the captain of Team USA and Johan Larsson was the captain of Sweden and a gold medalist.
Where he might go: Buffalo lacks a top center prospect and with their season looking bad, they could be on the lookout for a player like Coyle. Carolina and Anaheim both also wouldn't mind a top prospect like Coyle.
What he might be worth: As much as people want to believe prospects are worth alot, that just isn't true. However, Coyle is a very good prospect and has shown to be able to translate his NCAA performance to a more rigorous schedule playing in the QMJHL.
Coyle alone could bring in a late 1st and 2nd in the 2012 NHL Entry Draft, but he could help a trade package to bring in a good player, much like the way the Sharks sent Coyle and other things for Brent Burns.
Other considerations: Coyle can easily be switch out by several Wild prospects such as Zach Phillips, Jason Zucker, Johan Larsson, but I can tell you, the Wild love ALL of them.
The bottom line: Bottom line? Don't expect any of these forwards to be traded but you never know. If the Wild decide to push for the playoffs, you need to give to get, and Coyle has very good value in him.
Why is he available: Once again, Cody Almond sees his time with the Wild dangerously short as the trade deadline approaches. While he isn't a prospect that will be highly sought for, he is a solid prospect that is developing well into a bottom six filler.
However, with Chad Rau, Carson McMillan and Jarod Palmer with impressive callups, and the expected injection of Mikael Granlund, Jason Zucker, Charlie Coyle, Brett Bulmer, and Johan Larsson, Almond is quickly falling down the ranks, making him expendable.
Where he might go: He really could go anywhere...
What he might be worth: Very little. Best thing to do is to package him into a deal but if he were to be traded alone, you could maybe garner a 6th or 7th round pick. He is a decent player but he just hasn't shown dominance in any single area (toughness, skill, speed etc.).
The bottom line: He will be a decent throw in in any deal, just to sweeten a deal.
Why is he available:The Wild have a number of emerging young defenseman on the roster such as Marco Scandella, Jared Spurgeon, and Nate Prosser. Prosser recently just signed a two-year extension and Scandella and Spurgeon playing as if they are the team's top defensive pairing.
That leaves out Falk, who by no means is playing bad. He is mobile, safe, and does his job. However, if I had to choose between all the young defensemen, Falk would be the most expendable (with value of course). In addition, he has played a good amount of NHL games to help any team immediately.
Where he might go: Tampa Bay could use a solid defenseman who could help continue its youthful surge with Stamkos and Hedman. He can pretty much help any team because he's young and cheap.
What he might be worth: He could be worth as high as a mid-round pick. However, it'll require the right suitor. Many teams would not because he is still young and has yet to play an entire season in the NHL, but with the right team, they may see promise in a cheap, mobile and physical option.
The bottom line: I don't want to see him go. With all the years of struggle the Wild has seen, the team needs to remind itself it needs to keep its cheap bottom pairing players. While they may not be the team's key players, they contribute by playing solid minutes and for rookie salaries.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No no no no no no no
We must hoard the future.. HOARD!!!
Don't know what I'm fighting for, but I know what I'm fighting against
by PUTTINxONxTHExFOIL on Feb 21, 2012 5:20 PM CST via mobile reply actions
100% Agree
Unless the Aeros players names are Almond and Staubitz NO!
There will be a time when we are one or two players away from a legit cup run where you can sacrifice some prospects…. We are not there. Let’s see what we got before we throw them away for a band aid for this year.
I mean im ok with almond
But because I don’t see how he really fits in in the future. Although he wouldn’t look terrible on our fourth line. I really think Coyle might be something special. He’s a meathead, but a lot of hockey players are. It takes a certain amount of skill to fail out of a hockey school when you are a star player on the freaking hockey team. On that alone I’m intrigued.
Don't know what I'm fighting for, but I know what I'm fighting against
by PUTTINxONxTHExFOIL on Feb 21, 2012 9:38 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
The Preds like to hoard too!
It’s a great way to build a team, it just takes a few years. But once all the young guys finally get pulled up and start playing pro, it’s totally worth the wait.
Hands go uuppp..... AND THEY STAY THERE!
-nashvillepredators-
The team we have now, when playing the system, is good enough to make the play-offs.
Deal Zidlicky, Zanon, Lundin, Almond etc. by all means. These guys have had chances and have proven to be surplus to requirements.
Keep all the talented prospects and see what we can do this year with the current team.
Follow me on Twitter @GerDevine
Minnesota Wild's international fanbase.
Agreed
Unless you can miraculously package one of them to get a bona fide scoring top six winger, keep the talent and deal the UFA’s. We can discuss this again next year, when hopefully we are sitting in a better position. Then we might be able to turn the young talent into a player that can push us over the hump.
Columbus did sign L-3bda... maybe they'd be willing to take Zidlicky off your hands!
Hands go uuppp..... AND THEY STAY THERE!
-nashvillepredators-
I don't think they trade any of them right now.
Maybe let some of the forwards get some AHL and NHL experience and increase their value first. Granlund is a lock for next year but for some reason, if the Wild fail to sign any other offensive forwards, I think Larsson makes the team too. Zucker, Phillips, Coyle – that is your potential future second line in 1-2 years. No one wants an unproven goalie and I think they resign Falk, they like him with Prosser and they will be a solid if not spectacular 5-6 pairing.
I agree
I highly doubt any of the prospects get traded now, especially considering their current standing in the playoff race.
I agree that Granlund is a lock to be with the Wild next year. I don’t think Larsson is though. If another prospects makes the jump, I think it will be either Coyle or Bulmer.
Coyle has been dominating the Q since he jumped from the NCAA to there. He is certainly physically ready to play in the NHL at 6’2" and 205 lbs. Also, I think he has 1st line potential. He can do a lot that Lats can do and hopefully be healthy at the same time. If they decide not to put Granlund on the top line, I would like to see Coyle there. Three big bodies on the first line worked well at the beginning of the year.
If not Coyle, I think Bulmer will be up. He played well at the beginning of the year. If they put Granlund on the first line and bring up another prospect I think it will be Bulmer. Larsson will be in Houston probably playing 2nd line center behind Phillips.
by J.A.Berty1330 on Feb 21, 2012 9:38 PM CST up reply actions
When Coyle left BU for the QMJHL, I recall that the Wild weren’t willing to sign him and send him to Houston because they didn’t feel he was ready. That makes me believe they have next year set aside for him to develop in the AHL. Larsson on the other hand, he has been playing in the SEL for a couple years now. I think the Wild views him as more NHL-ready simply because he’s been playing professionally for a while, while Coyle has been in the NCAA and Canadian juniors. I agree Coyle might have more upside in the NHL, but I have to believe Larsson is the more ready prospect for next year.
The Wild did not sign Coyle when he left BU because they wanted to make it clear that they would not turn a player pro in the middle of his college season. No other reason.
Editor:Hockey Wilderness Swarm Beat Writer:In Lax We Trust Now with more Twitterness: ReynoldsSBN
Master of unsustainable passive regression.
So is that a sort of gentlemen’s agreement with colleges? Not to poach their talent during their season? Coyle’s situation seems a little different than a Wellman/Fontaine since he made the decision to leave in the middle, wasn’t seduced away by the Wild. I’m guessing the Wild didn’t want to sign him to avoid any sort of appearance of impropriety or interference with an NCAA program mid-season?
I would say it is a gentlemen's agreement the Wild have with colleges.
Other teams, most notably the Islanders, have poached kids from college mid-season before.
Wellman and Fontaine left after the season was over
Coyle left mid season. Whether or not the Wild had any part in him leaving, if they signed him it would certainly look like they did which doesn’t look too good.
by J.A.Berty1330 on Feb 23, 2012 11:40 AM CST up reply actions
You under-rate Larsson
Larsson is likely the most ready, outside of Granlund, of any of our players. Coyle and Phillips have been doing very well against the Q, but the fact remains that league is filled with player 16-19 years old. Larsson is largely playing against men, and is 13th in the league in scoring despite playing 5 or so less games than most of the people ahead of him(due to the WJC, Silfverberg who is ahead of him is at a similiar game total).
He gets under-rated because, his 34 points in 43 games doesn’t look flashy, but the SEL is a league that concentrates very hard on the defensive side of the ice. You just dont get a lot of crazy point totals in that league. Where the Q is all offense. Larsson is the most complete player, outside of Granlund in our prospect pool.
Yes,
I think that Larsson is going to be a heck of a player, and one that is likely much closer to the NHL than most other prospects in the system. He probably has less offensive upside than both Coyle or Phillips, but Larsson looks like he’ll bring grit, secondary scoring, and potential leadership to the team. I would say… Brodziak plus would be his mid-point comparable. With Brodziak and Cullen on board, at least right now, for next season, I don’t quite know how Larsson will be used. It seems certain that he’ll start in the AHL. He’ll probably be a guy who gets a call up if one of the top centers gets hurt though. Of course, that also depends on where Granlund is and what position he’s playing (Center or Wing).
by Krotz the Wall on Feb 22, 2012 9:26 AM CST up reply actions
Never said Larsson isn't a hell of a player
I just don’t think he has the offensive upside that Coyle/ Phillips do. Phillips, I’m guessing, will be in Houston next year probably as the 1st or 2nd line center. I think Larsson will be the other top 2 line center in Houston. When Cullen’s contract expires I imagine Larsson will come up. Pure speculation obviously.
by J.A.Berty1330 on Feb 22, 2012 2:23 PM CST up reply actions
Upside is one thing
Ready for the NHL is different, and the Wild are going to likely be deciding who stays in MN and who goes back to Houston by who is ready, not who has the most offensive upside.
True
Where would he play though? Unless I’m mistaken, he’s been playing center, right? Koivu, Cullen, and Brodziak are all under contract next year.
Coyle and Bulmer are both wingers and it may become a sheer numbers game. He always could wing I suppose.
by J.A.Berty1330 on Feb 22, 2012 8:38 PM CST up reply actions
You think that Coyle,
A talented, big-bodied and highly skilled power forward prospect would be the likely odd man out because Jason Zucker, an under-sized NCAA scorer was captain of the USA under 21 team? Johan Larsson does sound like he could be a heck of a player, and hit the NHL maybe sooner than the other two, but he also is projecting out as a high functioning 3rd liner. I don’t know, I just would imagine that the Wild would value a shot at a true power forward, goal scorer over a small skills guy and a hard working grit player.
I guess the bottom line is that I’m just not as high on Zucker as a lot of people around here seem to be. I just look at all those other smaller college players who excelled in more open systems and against slightly lesser talent that were also often unable to transition to the NHL game. I think the road for Zucker is longer than the others because he has no real defined role in his game and will have to work hard to find a role so he doesn’t become a Wellman. I hope he can do it, but I think he’ll see the AHL for a number of years before he gets it figured out.
I'm not as high on Zucker as most either.
I think he is going to be just like Setoguchi, which is to say, good but not great. He seems like he will be the compliment on the line, not the focus. Much like Seto appears to need Koivu to get him going, my bet is Zucker will be the passenger on the line that is driven by Phillips and Coyle. And for those that are down on Phillips due to his skating, don’t rule out the return of the two line pass which will focus more on playmaking than speed. A return of the red line could play right into the Wild’s game.
I'm not a talent scout or anything
But my gut says I would rather give up Zucker and Coyle at this point. I’d also be willing to give up some goalies seeing as how we could have a log jam at that position in the future.
Falk
Personally, I’d like to see more of Falk in a Wild jersey. Besides Stoner, the Wild don’t have a big-bodied d-man who can play physical (and drop the gloves if needed).
Son-of-a-bitch is dug in like an Alabama tick!
Falk is a beast
That zombie look he always gives is just scary.
Don't know what I'm fighting for, but I know what I'm fighting against
by PUTTINxONxTHExFOIL on Feb 22, 2012 5:17 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Coyle!
Oh hell no! Second best prospect in my opinion.
























