FanPost

A CBA question for the Masses


The NHLPA is sticking to their guns about how expanded revenue sharing will love a multitude of problems for the NHL.

The league flat out wants to just pay less to players. While there have numerous players attending these negotiations, there have been very few owners that attended.

With a majority of NHL franchises "losing money" do you think that if it were to come to a vote, that struggling owners will rise up against the few that prosper an adopt a version of revenue sharing that the PA originally proposed? And as a follow-up, do the owners make any significant concessions?

The opinions posted here are not those of Hockey Wilderness

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Hockey Wilderness

You must be a member of Hockey Wilderness to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Hockey Wilderness. You should read them.

Join Hockey Wilderness

You must be a member of Hockey Wilderness to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Hockey Wilderness. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9355_tracker