clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Taking issue with The Hockey News Wild prospect ratings

There are a few questions surrounding the last top 10 prospect rankings for the the Wild from The Hockey News

Bruce Bennett

When it comes to hockey coverage and news, The Hockey News is typically one of the best places to get information from. Our favorite beat writer Michael Russo writes Wild features for the publication, and overall their writers are very knowledgeable.

So, imagine my surprise when I opened up the 2013-2014 Yearbook edition last night and saw the following top 10 prospects feature for the Minnesota Wild:

1. Mathew Dumba

2. Gustav Olofsson

3. Brett Bulmer

4. Zack Phillips

5. Darcy Kuemper

6. Kurtis Gabriel

7. Mario Lucia

8. John Draeger

9. R. Bussieres

10. Tyler Graovac

One of the biggest issues has to be the glaring omission of forward Erik Haula. A seventh round pick from 2009, Haula made the jump from the Minnesota Golden Gophers hockey team to the Wild's minor league affiliate in April of 2013, and is in month 5 of his entry level contract

Despite GM Chuck Fletcher's comments that Haula could compete for the 2nd line center spot with Charlie Coyle and Mikael Granlund in training camp this year, Haula has yet to actually put on a jersey for the Wild. He only played 6 games for the Aeros after signing his ECL.

The Wild obviously still consider him a prospect as well, which frankly should be the standard followed when it comes to prospect ratings. He took part in the Wild's development camp in July alongside almost every player on this list with the exceptions of Darcy Kuemper (we'll get to him in just a minute) and Mario Lucia (he was excused due to school finals).

The second major issue with the list is the placement of the AHL guys. I spent the entire lockout watching the Aeros play, and even talked with some of the other sports writers who had covered the team for multiple seasons to make sure I wasn't off base with my assessments.

Bulmer has the upside to be a great player, but last season was a really rough year for the 21 year old. He spent half the season being injured and/or scratched, and when he was playing he was pretty invisible.

He has the potential to be a good player, but being ranked as the 3rd top prospect in the organization is putting a lot of stock in a player who still has a lot of questions surrounding his play at the moment. His placement on the list probably would have been better suited in the bottom half.

Phillips is one of those players who has a lot going against him when it comes to being ranked. He's very small for a hockey player, and most definitely had a tough adjustment from juniors to the AHL. Many Wild fans have given up on him, although most people who take the time to watch him play understand that the talent is there.

He has a solid couple years worth of work ahead of him to get towards being NHL ready. Even then, the likelihood that he is going to turn into a top tier center is drastically small. Like Bulmer, his listing should have been in the bottom half, maybe as high as 6 or 7.

Finally, there is Kuemper. The issue here is not so much his placement on the list (although he probably should have been ranked higher, maybe as high as 3) so much as the people ahead of him on the list. Bulmer and Phillips have no place being rated higher on a prospect list than Kuemper.

Anyone who has watched Kuemper play more than two games knows that he has all the makings of an extremely talented, top-end goalie. As long as he continues to develop and learn in the AHL the next couple of seasons, as well as stay most injury-free, Kuemper will be a starting goaltender in the NHL within the next 5 years. Ms.Conduct has repeatedly stated the same thing, and the folks at TheGoalieGuild (note: this was written last Oct.) are very high on his potential. There is a reason that the Wild sent Matt Hackett in the Jason Pominville trade instead of Kuemper.

As far as the non-AHL guys go, because I haven't spent a lot of time actively scouting them I'm not going to dispute their placement, with one exception. I've seen some footage of Olofsson playing, and while he looks to have the potential to be a great defenseman, the number 2 ranking seems a bit high.