clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Pivotal Moment: Yeo Leaves Kuemper In

New, comments

Last night's game was fun. Very fun. There were, in the first period alone, 3-4 different events which could be strongly argued as the "pivotal moment."

Bruce Fedyck-USA TODAY Sports

The beginning of the game was wild, with Jason Zucker scoring in just 10 seconds (a record for the Wild franchise). At 46 seconds, Coyle's wrist shot was saved by Michael Hutchinson. 30 seconds later, at 1:22, Bryan Little tipped-in the tying goal. Put another way: both teams scored on their first shot on goal.

At this point, some coaches would pull a goalie (who has allowed 2 goals on 4 shots)

For the rest of the period, Michael Hutchinson wouldn't let in another goal. The same was not true for Darcy Kuemper. Kuemper saved a shot from Mark Stuart at 2:16 of the period, as well as a shot from Dustin Byfuglien at 3:09. Zach Parise had a shot saved by Hutchinson at 3:16, after which the Jets would take the puck back down the ice and score on an Andrew Ladd wrist shot.

At this point, some coaches would pull a goalie (who has allowed 2 goals on 4 shots). Kuemper would save 5 more shots before letting in goal number 3, a wrist shot from Nikolaj Ehlers. This would bring the total to 3 goals let in on 10 shots, a save percentage right around 67%.

At this point, again, Mike Yeo decided to keep Kuemper in the game, only to pull him after he let in a Drew Stafford wrist shot 51 seconds into the 2nd period. As you may recall, Devan Dubnyk would let in the first shot he faced, bringing Winnipeg's total to 5 goals on 18 shots.

Now, none of this is to say every goal was Kuemper's fault; of the first three, I think you can at most put two of them on Kuemper, and even then the defense needs at least some of the blame. The defense did not play well. The offense did not play well. More or less no one on the Wild played well for the entirety of the first period, save perhaps Jason Zucker.

At the same time, When Kuemper was fighting the puck as clearly as he was (letting in goals, giving up rebounds, etc), nothing good was going to come of leaving him in. If Kuemper had let in one and stood strong (like Hutchinson), that would have been one thing. Just three shots later, Kuemper had conceded another goal. Shortly afterward, he nearly let in another:

That's not good, and the goal Kuemper let in after the intermission was nearly a carbon-copy.

Had Yeo put Dubnyk in after two, or even three goals, perhaps the Wild win this game. but he didn't, and the Wild were unable to recover. That, for me, was the pivotal moment of the game.

Addendum

At some point, the Wild will need Kuemper to play a full game, consequences be darned. Hopefully not every start will see him let in 2 goals on 4 shots, or 4 on 20. Furthermore, let's not pretend that the Wild were playing well and were let down by bad goaltending- no one on the Wild played well for the first period (except for Zucker for the first 10 seconds).

Leaving Kuemper in was a big decision, and one which many fans agree with. It was, for me, the moment the Wild lost the game. Perhaps this will help Kuemper learn and improve, perhaps not. Either way, it was last night's pivotal moment.