clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Minnesota Wild Top-25 Under-25: Introduction

New, comments

Hockey Wilderness kicks off its Second Annual Top-25 Under-25 Rankings

Joel Eriksson Ek will make the Top-25 Under-25, but where?
Joel Eriksson Ek will make the Top-25 Under-25, but where?
Steve Mitchell-USA TODAY Sports

If there's going to be a theme to this year's Hockey Wilderness Top-25 Under-25 Rankings, it'll be turnover.

This was obvious as far back as last year, with 5 of the players on last year's list (including 3 of the top-10) turning 25, but the changes don't end there. The emergence of Jason Zucker and the acquisition of Mike Reilly are bound to shake things up at the top, and over 10 names who didn't appear on last year's list have managed to find their way in this year's rankings.

Over the next 5 weeks, myself and 7 other Hockey Wilderness writers will be bringing you profiles of the Top-25 Minnesota Wild players under the age of 25, as determined by a combination of our personal rankings. But why players under 25? Why not just do a standard prospect list?

The main reason is that the definition of a prospect can be a tricky one. For example, is Christian Folin a prospect? He played 40 games with the Wild last season, but he did have a stint in Iowa, and may find himself in Iowa due to the sheer amount of options the Wild have on defense.

Is there any value to this? Of course! With the Wild having quite a few long-term contracts to veterans on the books for the foreseeable future, they may be forced to make difficult salary cap decisions down the road. Since our rankings are based on whether we would trade a player on the list for another, we're trying to figure out which players that we would like to see the Wild keep at all costs, and which ones we would reluctantly let go, were a worst-case scenario to happen.

We'll start with #25 on Monday, but until then, here are the Under-25 players who dropped off last year's list, and why they didn't make the cut this season.

Brett Bulmer

2014 Rank: 13th

Why He Fell Short: Five years removed from being selected as a second-rounder, it's hard to qualify Bulmer as anything but a disappointment. He's 23 with 145 AHL games under his belt, and has only mustered 20 goals and 44 points. Granted, the Iowa Wild teams he's played for have been garbage, but others have succeeded individually in Des Moines. He's looked good in a couple cups of coffee for the Wild, but he's going to have to stay healthy to be productive to crack the T25U25 next year, let alone the Wild roster.

Raphael Bussieres

2014 Rank: 19th

Why He Fell Short: Like Bulmer, Bussieres is another big, raw, toolsy winger whose career hit a brick wall in Iowa. He's younger than Bulmer, and he showed a decent amount of potential in Juniors. Bussieres found himself unable to crack the Iowa lineup, and the organization responded sending him to the ECHL, where he had a decent stretch.

Zack Phillips

2014 Rank: 21st

Why He Fell Short: His lack of foot speed is the root of his issues, as he is just not fast enough to translate his skills into results. For an offensive center that was selected with a first round pick, 75 points in almost 200 Aeros/IA Wild games is an embarrassment. There've been very loud rumblings of him being a player who's uncommitted to doing what it takes to succeed. Zack Phillips has unquestionably been the biggest bust of the Chuck Fletcher era.

Oh, and also, he was traded to Boston. But the other factors probably matter more.

Johan Gustafsson

2014 Rank: 22nd

Why He Fell Short: He was put in no position to succeed at all, but he did nothing to help his cause at all. His terrible save percentage (.893) was thoroughly out-classed by John Curry (.917), and hopefully a change of scenery (he's headed to the Swedish Elite League) will allow him to clear his head.

Guillaume Gelinas

2014 Rank: 23rd

Why He Fell Short: Sensing a theme? Iowa is apparently death to all but the most sure-fire of prospects. Gelinas struggled to consistently crack the lineup in his first pro season, scoring 4 points in 37 games. The diminutive blue-liner was a late-bloomer in Juniors, so there's the possibility that he can adjust and raise his stock. But judging from what he's accomplished in pro hockey, there wasn't really much justification to rank him.

Adam Gilmour

2014 Rank: 25th

Why He Fell Short: If any of the players who fell of the list deserved to stick for another year, it was Gilmour. His role (and numbers) improved at Boston College, and he had a good amount of success with fellow Wild prospect Alex Tuch. Higher-upside options bumped him off this year's T25U25, but a solid junior season should see the two-way center make the list next season.

And here are the 5 players who lost eligibility for this year's list:

Michael Keranen

Darcy Kuemper

Marco Scandella

Jordan Schroeder

Jared Spurgeon